MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Best Possible Recording Method?, 24bit/44.1k? - 16bit/96k? - HELP ME!
tacoboy
posté jeu. 10 avril 2003, 19:13
Message #1


Rookie
*

Groupe : Members
Messages : 34
Inscrit : 06 avril 03
Lieu : Melbourne - AU
Membre no 15,653




My sound card supports upto 24bit 96khz. Ive been wise enough to start recording in 24bit (I think i can hear a difference, a certain shimmer stays with the sound) but im still recording in 44.1. If i start recording in 96k will it make a difference? I dont think my silver ears can tell the difference!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rickenbacker
posté ven. 11 avril 2003, 12:10
Message #2


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 645
Inscrit : 17 mai 02
Lieu : Broughton
Membre no 4,705




Not unless you're a bat.

The general consensus from what I've read seems to be that upping the bit rate is more beneficial to the sound than upping the sample rate. Recording at 96KHz will doubtless improve audio quality, but not so much that 99.99% of people will be able to tell.

24-bit, 44.1KHz seems like a good compromise, it preserves audio detail, saves file space and avoids accumulating artefacts when downsampling from 48 or 96 to 44.1.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - jeudi 7 nov. 2024, 15:43
- © MacMusic 1997-2008