  |
 Mastering: Peak, T-racks, Or Other? |
 mar. 27 févr. 2007, 09:10
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 17 Inscrit : 02 juin 06 Membre no 80,236  |
I'm currently using Cubase SE as my sequencer and I'm wondering which is more flexible for mastering...Bias Peak LE or just bouncing the mix down to a stereo .wav and using something like T-Racks in Cubase?
I'm open to other options, as well. -wilhelm |
 |
 
|
|
mar. 6 mars 2007, 22:29
Message
#2
|
|
 Tikophobe forever…  Groupe : Team Messages : 6,651 Inscrit : 08 févr. 03 Lieu : Fontaine Daniel - FR Membre no 11,773 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
mer. 7 mars 2007, 07:45
Message
#3
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 1 Inscrit : 04 oct. 06 Lieu : Groningen - NL Membre no 83,850 |
i think t-racks is a very good choice your 'mastering' ...with an easy GUI
and have a good (analog) sound ... now a few years is izotope also an good alternate for your mastering.... 
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 7 mars 2007, 12:17
Message
#4
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 12 Inscrit : 25 oct. 05 Lieu : Kaliningrad - RU Membre no 71,671 |
It is common to consider that either way would be flexible enough. Cubase is well fit to handle mastering tasks, and T-Racks is a well respected mastering tool. You might want to chenk out articles on the web regarding mastering in your DAW, like the one at http://www.tweakheadz.com/mastering_your_audio.htm or, of course, SOS archives at www.soundonsound.com. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
