![]() |
![]()
Message
#1
|
|
![]() Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 15 Inscrit : 05 févr. 04 Lieu : GREELEY - US Membre no 34,987 ![]() |
i am a new commer to digital recording, i have a strong mac with plenty of power. i was thinking about purchasing the mbox, is anybody familiar with this device? i am looking for quality vocal recording at a low price. can anybody throw down some 2 cents......
thanks |
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
![]()
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 77 Inscrit : 30 juil. 03 Lieu : Malmö - SE Membre no 22,159 ![]() |
I bought the mBox and moved to ProTools after much angst about which system to choose. I also make hiphop, and the things that made me choose mBox/ProTools was:
*good sound quality on two channels (rarely would need any more for recording vocals and the odd instrument + monitoring) *nice micpreamps built-in *no powercord needed AND *ProTools has got an excellent way of handling tempo for audio (not as great for midi, though). I mostly make music by cutting and pasting audio until i find something nice. The thing with ProTools is that i can set the tempo afterwards and get my chaotic cutting and pasting to fit perfectly within a 4/4 loop, making it easy to arrange, and I can do it all within the same window as I am cutting and pasting in. It so much less fuzz and more creative than Cubase VST which I made the transition from. In general ProTools is very simple and very powerful, features much appreciated after struggling with other maze-like applications. The downside is that ProTools is eating CPU, really. There are other threads here on macmusic which treats amounts of channels/effects possible. It is not an issue with very powerful macs, I think. Do a search in the forums. The other downside is the retarded support for other applications and stuttering OSX support. I believe that the mBox is usable with most apps these days, either via the extraretarded CoreAudio-driver or via JackTools |
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet























![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
