mar. 8 juil. 2003, 18:04
Message
#1
|
|
![]() Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 10 Inscrit : 07 juil. 03 Lieu : - US Membre no 20,920 |
Anybody using the Mach Five sampler yet? Is it available? I know MOTU had said available end of June but you know them....
Thanks |
|
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
ven. 26 mars 2004, 09:02
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 359 Inscrit : 11 févr. 01 Lieu : Yerres - FR Membre no 268 |
I'll put another one in - kotakt. The three are quite different in the way they work. Firstly Reason, is a whole studio package, with two synthsiser modules (sybstractive and granular), two samplers, loop player, drum machine and a host of different effects. Very powerful in my opinion. But the samplers handle only one instrument at a time, which means that doing any serious orchestral work is out of the question. You would need stacks of NN-XT...no keyswitching but very nice zone layering passible.
MachFive is a 16 part sampler so it is more suited for multi instrument support, but it has no DFD (direct from disk) support (although that is comnig in april from what I hear) and no keyswitching, so importing a massive giga piano is a no way. has a built-in analyzer and a tuner. Great for fixing certain orchestral libraries, notorious for having bad tuning. Finally Kontakt - very powerful too, keyswitching and DFD insluded. Very nice for setting up elaborate string instruments etc, witih all the different playing techniques under one instrument. Giga files are well recognized. Quite good processor handling. I would recommend Reason AND a Sampler for big, key-switched files. -------------------- When you understand disorder, out of that understanding comes order-JK.
http://www.audioplanet.fr |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
TiguerSound Motu Mach Five - Anybody Using It? Is It Our Yet? mar. 8 juil. 2003, 18:04
renell A forum post over at osxaudio.com claims that Mach... mer. 9 juil. 2003, 11:04
soundesignr I purchased Mach Five about a month ago, but haven... jeu. 27 nov. 2003, 01:22
lepetitmartien we have already a few users that have been a bit t... jeu. 27 nov. 2003, 05:13
mook noodler I got MachFive about a week ago. I'm diggin... mar. 9 déc. 2003, 08:50
azusa I've been using it for a while now. Like it a ... mar. 9 déc. 2003, 10:38
macdummy04 I am a software sampler newbie.
I use DP 4.11 in... mer. 7 janv. 2004, 16:32
joepp379 Hello I currently have MACH FIVE running under DP... mer. 7 janv. 2004, 21:51
azusa QUOTE (macdummy04 @ Jan 7 2004, 07:32)Are the... jeu. 8 janv. 2004, 02:13
midilance It's quite possible that your drum sounds are ... jeu. 8 janv. 2004, 18:02
Javier Calderon Hi all. I think I'm going to be getting DP 4 ... sam. 28 févr. 2004, 06:48
sbolinger I'm currently using MachFive in ProTools LE 6.... mar. 20 avril 2004, 03:01
stratology Bought this about a week ago, now I consider retur... jeu. 29 avril 2004, 11:59
jklimeck You are totally right, Mach 5 on a Power Book 1Ghz... jeu. 29 avril 2004, 17:41
Dave Bourke I don't own Mach 5, but I just thought I'd... ven. 30 avril 2004, 12:15
stratology jklimeck, do you think the poor performance (proce... ven. 7 mai 2004, 00:48
jklimeck I am not sure this is related to the UVI engine, I... ven. 7 mai 2004, 01:01
stratology Dave, do you have any information about the new Mo... lun. 10 mai 2004, 17:25
Dave Bourke I don't know about this one, Frank.
Sorry :-( lun. 10 mai 2004, 18:33![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :











