 older powerbooks better, bandwidth spec critical for audio |
 mar. 14 mai 2002, 19:01
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 6 Inscrit : 14 mai 02 Membre no 4,656  |
this page documents tests done on the 400/500mhz g4 powerbooks vs the newer 550/667mhz g4 powerbooks that find that logic runs FAR BETTER on the older powerbooks because apparently, the bandwidth spec is better and allows for a greater number of realtime activities or something like that. i don't know much about computers. but this seems important! check this page:
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/systems/PowerBo...ake3.html#logic someone out there please confirm or comment on this as i believe it concerns a great many of us. tanks. |
 |
 
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
jeu. 16 mai 2002, 03:07
Message
#2
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 5 Inscrit : 12 avril 02 Lieu : Paris Membre no 4,229 |
After reading that article a few months ago, I did testings of my own on a 667 vs. 500 PB under logic...and i'm sorry to report the 667 came in ahead with more platinumverbs than the 500, using identical settings on the same track and song for both.
I should be getting a new model 667 in a few days, with the 1mb L3 cache, I will perform new tests to see if the increased cache does increase plug-ins/ number of tracks. I'll keep u posted... |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
brownboy older powerbooks better mar. 14 mai 2002, 19:01
prutulz seems strange....
anyone could confirm this? mer. 15 mai 2002, 11:07 brownboy hey thanks so much, testaroza. that really helps ... jeu. 16 mai 2002, 17:55 testaroza well i had to turn in my 667 not long ago to Apple... ven. 17 mai 2002, 04:15 brownboy ok! this is getting interesting. great to have a... ven. 17 mai 2002, 07:33 lepetitmartien Mr brownboy, it'll help everyone in this community... sam. 18 mai 2002, 02:11 lepetitmartien For the firewire experiment, someone else began th... sam. 18 mai 2002, 03:06
brownboy ok sure, mr. lepetitmartien. sam. 18 mai 2002, 09:10 |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
