jeu. 26 juin 2003, 09:47
Message
#1
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 6 Inscrit : 25 juin 03 Lieu : Vancouver - CA Membre no 20,181 |
*Mistakenly posted this in "Plug-Ins" group -- apologies to Moderator...
Wondering if anyone out there has had experience using a Mackie Control w the UAD-1 PCI dsp card? I'm waiting for a Control, and was strongly considering purchasing the UAD to take the pressure of my B&W G3 400. However I noticed at the Mackie/UAD downloads page there is a list of "issues", including the fairly ambiguous note that the UAD does not work "correctly" with the Mackie Control in both MAS and VST. Tried e-mailing Mackie but no response yet. Anyone have any details on exactly what does not work "correctly"? Need to know how bad this is before I invest in the UAD... (SetUp: B&W G3 400, 700+ megs RAM, DP 3.x in OS 9, MOTU 828, soon a Mackie Control) TIA |
|
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
sam. 28 juin 2003, 06:26
Message
#2
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 300 Inscrit : 21 août 02 Membre no 7,031 |
I use the UAD-1 card with DP3. It's fantastic. I got the sound I'd been looking for from plug ins.
About the latency, all you have to do is put in a plug in compensation to the other tracks that don't use UAD (DP only). It will sync perfectly. The CPU performance meter stays surprisingly low when using UAD-1. All I have is a praise for the card. The only thing that UAD-1 has a trouble with is the PCI video card in your Mac. It has to be AGP type otherwise you can't start the computer. And for the Mackie control, it'll be a while before I can buy one. |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
emtee Mackie Control Vs Uad-1 jeu. 26 juin 2003, 09:47
gramps while this may not be the answer you are looking f... ven. 27 juin 2003, 11:13
emtee just checkin back -- thanks for the responses so f... sam. 28 juin 2003, 07:55
gramps speaking as a pc user, you pretty much can't p... sam. 28 juin 2003, 10:15
emtee Just an update -- and maybe some info:
Bit the bu... dim. 6 juil. 2003, 19:32![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :




jeu. 26 juin 2003, 09:47




