![]() |
![]()
Message
#1
|
|
![]() Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 4 Inscrit : 22 déc. 01 Lieu : Glasgow Membre no 2,755 ![]() |
First time post.
Anyone out there use Opcode's Studio Vision Pro? Chat, discuss future development in light of Gibson take-over. Regards, Steve -------------------- steveb
|
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
![]()
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 12 Inscrit : 31 mars 02 Lieu : Culver City Membre no 4,062 ![]() |
Hi Steve;
I'm starting to get more excited about Cubase, the more I delve into it. The biggest difference( which is the crux of both applications) is how songs are arranged and constructed. SVP had built its paradigm and structure on seqences and mini-sequences, in contrast wtih Cubase, where the whole song is constructed in one main arrange window. This concept is still taking me some time to get used to. ![]() OSX and music are not there yet! Supposedly the guy who wrote OMS is working at Apple now, helping them get OSX music-ready. Until that happens, switching between OS9 & X is going to be a way of life for us mac users. Good luck with your exodus to another app (DP or Cubase) and remember to have an open mind (I'm trying). ![]() John QUOTE Quote: from stevebrodie01 on April 7, 2002 - 14:21[br]Hi there, John,
Just got your post re SVP. Best on the planet, indeed! Ho-hum:( I've played around a bit with Cubase VST but it seems like another steep learning curve although VST instruments seem fun. I guess I'll just have to wind up my current stuff on SVP then take the plunge. To Cubase (or perhapsDP?) Since I haven't yet plucked up enough courage to contemplate OSX can you remind me of your understanding of the OMS implications. Great to hear from another SVP fan! Regards, Steve. |
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet



















![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
