MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Logic or Digital Performer?
posté dim. 4 nov. 2001, 05:13
Message #1





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




Well, my setup is going to be a Powermac g4 connected to a Motu-828.
The type of music Im producing is a mixture of Industrial, trance, and sampled tribal beats and influences...vocals as well.

Which program do you think would suite me the best in production? Both Logic and Digital Performer seem like great programs, Im just not sure which direction I should go.

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
posté mar. 27 nov. 2001, 06:00
Message #2





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




Take your pick! ProTools and Nuendo are geared more towards audio recording - less MIDI functionality. Cubase, DP, and Logic are the MIDI/Audio workhorses. I'm just getting around to checking them all out...I'm leaning towards DP or Logic as well. I'm more familiar with DP, having used it before, and like the idea of using an all-MOTU gear setup (828, DP, Midi AV Interface, Glyph MAS Firewire ext. hard drive). Logic has its own line of gear as well...check out the magazine Sound on Sound. They have the best reviews...one thing with using 828 with Logic: the ADAT sync requires ASIO 2 driver support by the host program. Apparently, using 828 with Logic, you can't sync the ADAT input. You still get the digital audio to come in, but it isn't sample-locked. Because MOTU makes DP, this does work. A small thing to consider.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
6 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (6 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - dimanche 12 janv. 2025, 20:16
- © MacMusic 1997-2008