MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Logic or Digital Performer?
posté dim. 4 nov. 2001, 05:13
Message #1





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




Well, my setup is going to be a Powermac g4 connected to a Motu-828.
The type of music Im producing is a mixture of Industrial, trance, and sampled tribal beats and influences...vocals as well.

Which program do you think would suite me the best in production? Both Logic and Digital Performer seem like great programs, Im just not sure which direction I should go.

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
posté sam. 24 nov. 2001, 23:33
Message #2





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




I have been looking at Digital Performer 3 without delving too deep into it. I started by using Cubase on the Atari for lots of years and then I got a Mac and I've mostly been using Logic, which I think is a really smart and neat program, to me it seems much more thouroughly made than Cubase. Since I work with a software company I can pretty much pick the package I like, but I still have a hard time deciding on which program to use as my main sequencer / audio suite.

For those of you who use Digital Performer 3, is there any way to change its track view, to resize the track list? I'm going mad trying to read those tiny letters on a big screen.

I use the iBook 500 and the Motu 828, which I got yesterday, so I am right now in the process of deciding which sequencer I'll go for... I'll try to be a bit more patient regarding settling my opinions of DP3. Performer has been around for a very long time, so I feel I have to get to know it, it can not just be neglected.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
10 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (10 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - dimanche 12 janv. 2025, 20:18
- © MacMusic 1997-2008