![]() |
![]()
Message
#1
|
|
![]() Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 7 Inscrit : 01 avril 03 Lieu : New York - US Membre no 15,367 ![]() |
First, thanks to all who chimed in on the logic big box v. cubase SL.
After doing a lot more research, I'm trying to decide between logic 6 Gold and Cubase SX. I tried cubase on a pc and liked it, but from looking at the Steinberg forum, there seems to be a lot of problems w/ OSX and Cubase SX, but it's always hard to tell if the people claiming that are just a vocal minority, using a cracked copy etc. I'd be interested in hearing if people think that Cubase SX works well with Mac, or, if it is excpetionally buggy and I should stick to an Apple-owend product, or DP 4. Thanks |
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
![]()
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Rookie ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 27 Inscrit : 09 févr. 03 Lieu : Burbank - US Membre no 11,875 ![]() |
Steinberg products have a deserved bad reputation on os9, but since they are coded in UNIX and osX is UNIX based - I've not heard a lot of complaining about sx on osX. No more than you hear complaining in general.
search the forums, even here there are lots of comparisons between these different systems. the run down = logic is for people who like playing with the tools or need very very detailed in depth control of their application. DP is favored by musicians with music schooling quite often, it is on osX now. Nuendo is a ProTools alternative with all of cubase sx's midi - 2 to be release next month. cubase is like nuendo but with less audio features and is generally favored by techno musicians who aren't using logic. Those are some huge generalizations to get the conversation started. |
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet















![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
