lun. 17 févr. 2003, 17:02
Message
#1
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 4 Inscrit : 17 févr. 03 Lieu : Alpharetta - US Membre no 12,515 |
Hey everybody. I just recently switched from a PC to my wonderful new PowerMac duel 1.25GHz G4. While on PC I used Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 and Sonar for all my recording/sequencing. Now that I'm on a mac, what should I look into? I seem to have noticed that the big players are Protools 6, MOTU Digital Performer, and Cubase. Any others I should look into? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
mer. 12 mars 2003, 12:59
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Maniac Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 645 Inscrit : 17 mai 02 Lieu : Broughton Membre no 4,705 |
I side with hanik over SX, but I'd go further and say it's not just for dance music - I record guitars, bass, vocals and other live instruments, plus add soft synths and drums via Midi. I'm working quicker and easier than I ever was with Logic and the results sound every bit as good as any sequencer I've tried - from what I understand, SX uses the same audio engine as Nuendo (Steinberg's top-end software).
If anyone has a bad attitude about Cubase, it usually relates to an older version - either that or they're just reciting something they've heard other people say. SX can handle it all - audio or Midi, plus you can use all the VST instruments and FX available. Plenty more are in progress, too. As for bugs, every computer program has them. I've already read plenty of angry comments about Logic 6. I think there's a definite snobbery about using Logic - it's not THAT great. Try as many as you can and see what suits you. Just don't get hustled into using something just 'cos everyone else does. |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
Kyle Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use? lun. 17 févr. 2003, 17:02
iman Hey kyle, i'm new to this myself (recent purch... lun. 17 févr. 2003, 23:09
lepetitmartien Welcome!
Now on the sequencers:
If you ne... lun. 17 févr. 2003, 23:48
Kyle Sounds great! Thanks for all the suggestions. ... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 00:07
garysome1 lepetitmartien,
I'm curious, what leads you to... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 05:40
stergz One thing to note about Pro Tools 6, is that you c... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 07:05
rickenbacker Ahem, LPM, I don't know if I'd call Cubase... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 11:06
lepetitmartien QUOTE (Kyle @ Feb 18 2003, 00:07)but what abo... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 16:44
rickenbacker QUOTE I think that if you can, you should really h... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 17:42
Kyle Once again, wonderful feedback. I have now removed... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 17:50
lepetitmartien You'll can still use PT free when it'll be... mar. 18 févr. 2003, 23:47
anarchosyn Kyle, it really comes down to what you feel you... mer. 19 févr. 2003, 05:52
rickenbacker Kyle: I don't know where you're based, but... mer. 19 févr. 2003, 12:37
sazerac Just thought I'd add my two cents - I started ... mer. 19 févr. 2003, 18:07
liquidh2o if you decide to go the Cubase route, I have the f... sam. 8 mars 2003, 13:58
mook noodler Hey Kyle, Steinberg has a demo version of Cubase S... mer. 12 mars 2003, 05:50
hanikfashhou I have a 1.25GHz Dual Processort, I'm running ... mer. 12 mars 2003, 11:19
lepetitmartien hanikfashhou cubase has had midi timing problems f... jeu. 13 mars 2003, 03:47
hanikfashhou Rickenbacker, unfortunately I havent used SX for r... ven. 14 mars 2003, 02:36
horselesspaul Kyle,
Can I just add that the oft aired Logic is w... ven. 14 mars 2003, 09:16![]() ![]() |
2 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (2 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :




lun. 17 févr. 2003, 17:02





