![]() |
![]() ![]()
Message
#1
|
|
SuperHero ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Banned Messages : 1,879 Inscrit : 24 févr. 02 Membre no 3,562 ![]() |
DigitMus said:
QUOTE Just got a MiniMe and it absolutely blows the 828 out of the water!! 2 phenomenal mic preamps, limiting, compression (you can even tweak the ratios by opening the top of the box!) famous Apogee A-D conversion (+UV22) 96khz operation, and you can even use different sample rates/bit depths SIMULTANEOUSLY (i.e. 96/24 from SPDIF & AES/EBU, and 44.1/16 via USB). For me, the 828 is now an expensive doorstop. Scott Holli answered: QUOTE mini-me sounds very cool fidelity wise, how much do they go for roughly? I could look on the web site but what kind of outs does it have, also what is the driver system? I think I speak for everyone but please let us know how you get on DigitMus , now and as an ongoing concern. Maybe this warrants a new forum! I for one would love to follow it's progress. Holli xxx Teiwaz answered: QUOTE DigitMus, Great to hear a fellow Apogee user talkin' loud! I LOVE my AD-8000...Apogee rule, man! Maybe we should open a new thread on the subject of the extremely exciting Apogee guys and their products... :D And now for the rest... ;-) Bye. |
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
![]()
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 103 Inscrit : 30 oct. 02 Lieu : Los Angeles - US Membre no 8,882 ![]() |
Sure Presto, but latency for Digitmus (as he himself pointed out) is not an issue when he records in the field with his laptop. He has some of the most impressive kit I have seen on this forum, so if the Mbox was better (!!) I'm sure he would be using it.
![]() Sound quality is of the essence here. The Mini-me is a pro sounding piece of kit. Digi's Mbox is not such a professional sounding unit (it's decidedly semi-pro), near zero latency or not, and it simply can't be pitted against anything Apogee put out there. It also depends if one relies on a USB convertor for EVERYTHING one records/mixes, or just for capturing audio in the field and then importing it into a pro rig back at the studio. If you rely on the Mbox for everything including overdubbing, then it may be great as a handy one stop solution, but in the situation of having to use a USB interface, I know what I would rather have...a clearer, professional sounding recording (Mini-me), and split the input into a small mixer for monitoring during recording...after all, you're stuck with a recording once it has been made, and it reflects on one's professionalism as to how good it sounds. It all depends on what/who the recording is for at the end of the day. Horses for courses... ![]() -------------------- Nobody can take from you what you give freely.
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet



































![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
