 Latency, liquid mix |
 jeu. 22 févr. 2007, 20:47
Message
#1
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 10 Inscrit : 16 juil. 06 Lieu : UK Membre no 81,478  |
Does anyone no how to help with the latency issues with the liquid mix and Pt le.I have the wrapper and it still sounds delayed.
many thanks |
 |
 
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
dim. 14 oct. 2007, 15:06
Message
#2
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 5 Inscrit : 14 oct. 07 Lieu : Hatfield - UK Membre no 95,850 |
Have you tried changing the playback buffer size?, changing that to 128 or 256 will improve your latency issue, but will also be more prone to spikes and error messages tho, dependant on how many plug ins and audio tracks you are using.
|
|
|
|
 lun. 17 déc. 2007, 18:04
Message
#3
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 5 Inscrit : 12 déc. 03 Lieu : London - UK Membre no 30,930 |
QUOTE (rpb1966 @ Sun 14 Oct 2007, 14:06)  Have you tried changing the playback buffer size?, changing that to 128 or 256 will improve your latency issue, but will also be more prone to spikes and error messages tho, dependant on how many plug ins and audio tracks you are using. What he said...  The lower the HW Buffer the lower the latency. 256 is usually ok, if you can get down to 128 or even 64 then give it a go. It depends how you record really. If you don't use many plug ins and rely on ext pre's for your sound, you can get a away with lower latencies. If you record with plug ins ie Compressions and Eq's then best to stay at 256. |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
armyboy Latency jeu. 22 févr. 2007, 20:47
aportman QUOTE (armyboy @ Thu 22 Feb 2007, 19:47) ... mar. 15 mai 2007, 06:37
urb1 to use the LM in PTLE, one should insert the time ... mar. 11 mars 2008, 17:21 rpb1966 QUOTE (urb1 @ Tue 11 Mar 2008, 16:21) to ... mar. 11 mars 2008, 17:31 |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
