Firewire Options On New Imacs, Is the 400/800 combination significantly better? Options

[cgt18]

I'm looking to buy either the latest 20" iMac or the 24" model.

I think the 20" screen size would be enough for me but I am wondering if the 2 x Firewire 400 ports will be
ok....or to look at it another way would the 1 x 400/ 1 x 800 on the 24" model give me a significant performance boost. I would probably go for 2 Gig of RAM to begin with whichever machine I opt to go for.

I am running Logic Pro 7/ Motu 828 MK2/ Powercore Firewire and a LaCie external drive via Firewire for my
audio files. Current computer is a 1 Ghz/17" Powerbook /1 Gb RAM ( I use the 400 port for my Motu, the
800 for the Audio/HD and the Powercore goes into the 2nd Firewire port on the 828...)

I rarely go to more than 24 audio tracks on any song.

Any thoughts much appreciated!

[monkeyboy23]

I'm looking to buy either the latest 20" iMac or the 24" model.

I think the 20" screen size would be enough for me but I am wondering if the 2 x Firewire 400 ports will be
ok....or to look at it another way would the 1 x 400/ 1 x 800 on the 24" model give me a significant performance boost. I would probably go for 2 Gig of RAM to begin with whichever machine I opt to go for.

I am running Logic Pro 7/ Motu 828 MK2/ Powercore Firewire and a LaCie external drive via Firewire for my
audio files. Current computer is a 1 Ghz/17" Powerbook /1 Gb RAM ( I use the 400 port for my Motu, the
800 for the Audio/HD and the Powercore goes into the 2nd Firewire port on the 828...)

I rarely go to more than 24 audio tracks on any song.

Any thoughts much appreciated!

You won't get any boost in performance unless the equipment in question is firewire 800...plugging a firewire 400 device into a 800 port doesn't make it faster.

[cgt18]

Thanks Monkeyboy...

The only piece of my kit that has an 800 port is the LaCie External Drive....
do you think there would be any perceptible difference if the Audio files are coming back via a 400?

Am I right in thinking that there might be a very slightly greater latency...BUT to a degree that is so small that
it is still perfectly acceptable to work with?

Can I also assume that a 400 is well capable of streaming the kind of track counts I use ( max 24 usually)?

Cheers
Chris