![]() |
![]()
Message
#1
|
|
![]() Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 4 Inscrit : 26 mars 05 Lieu : Valencia - ES Membre no 63,017 ![]() |
![]() In my homestudio I have a G4 1'25Ghz, 1 processor, 1,75Mb RAM running PROTOOLS 7.0 LE for my new DIGI002. (I record in an external FW800 HD) When my session has a few plugins, problems happen. My MAC just can't hold it all together... I know I need a G5 (Quad if possible.. haha), but... SHALL I BUY IT NOW with the ibm processors or WAIT until they offer a new G5 based in intel processors, and wait everybody (Digidesign, Spectrasonics, etc... ) to upgrade their software ???? PLEASE I NEED YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO. THANKS A LOT |
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
![]() ![]()
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Moderator In Chief (MIC) ![]() Groupe : Editors Messages : 15,189 Inscrit : 23 déc. 01 Lieu : Paris - FR Membre no 2,758 ![]() |
If it's your job, stick to G5, as you've got the software and hardware already and it'll work together with the less headaches fast. I don't see a serious opening for Professionals till autumn at least. also for those who rely on plug-ins, it's still a long way to go.
The fact the macintel are coming doesn't mean we can't work on G5 (and even on G4 for a lot of people). The question is more: Can it cope with what I do? Which one will work for me right now? How long do I plan to keep it? rafamira, as you rely on PT, I think the real question is more which G5 will you buy than are you going to intel. If you work now, there's just no intel answer. The Quad is a HUUUUUUGE machine. (jealous I am) ![]() Thinking about keeping a pro computer more than a 3 to 5 years span is… well… ![]() -------------------- Our Classifeds • Nos petites annonces • Terms Of Service / Conditions d'Utilisation • Forum Rules / Règles des Forums • MacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki? BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki? |
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet















![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
