 Hyperdraw Vs Track Automation, which has priority? |
 lun. 27 mars 2006, 16:47
Message
#1
|
|
 Rookie  Groupe : Members Messages : 35 Inscrit : 17 août 05 Lieu : Den Haag - NL Membre no 68,847  |
sometimes I use hyperdraw on regions then also use track automation(yellow line on track in arrange window) on the same track. Questiion: How do the two interact and how should I handle this aspect of volume control? I use volumn automation with these methods.. have tried a fader assigned to it through midi control (yamaha promix 1), but actually prefer tweaking with these arrange window lines. I just need to sort out how they interact and if I should just use one or the other..
advice? |
 |
 
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
jeu. 30 mars 2006, 01:04
Message
#2
|
|
 Maniac Member Groupe : Members Messages : 899 Inscrit : 12 oct. 01 Lieu : Kirkland Membre no 2,002 |
You have to go in and delete the nodes, or drag and drop the same audio region from the audio page.
No it's not a bug it work the way it was intended to. Hyperedit can only be displayed on one track or region at a time. It's just if you turn the display off, you risk creating automation that will be overridden. I only use it if I'm using several instances of a region and that the automation effects the actual performance of the part played. otherwise I use track automation, so I can view the automation of several tracks. 
-------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
makaala Hyperdraw Vs Track Automation lun. 27 mars 2006, 16:47
gdoubleyou Hyperedit automation is region based automation, i... lun. 27 mars 2006, 22:30 makaala G,
in my further science experiments with hyperdra... mar. 28 mars 2006, 12:36
 |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
