![]() |
![]()
Message
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 296 Inscrit : 10 août 02 Lieu : Rimghobb - UA Membre no 6,734 ![]() |
Despite our legitimate woes and lamentations as Mac musicians attempting to migrate to OS X (See: "The Name of This Forum is an Oxymoron), there are actually some very bright spots, and if the *promises* ever come due and collectible, we probably are on the brink of one of the best music computing systems to date with OS X.
Propellerhead Software is really to be commended for Reason 2.0. It is exceptional in many ways (the sequencer not necessarily being one of them ![]() ![]() Spark is another bright spot. Pun intended. ![]() ![]() Bias has trotted out Peak, which seems to do what it's always done just as well as ever, and Bias also beat the pack to the DAW finish line with Deck 3.5--though it's still crippled by lack of integrated MIDI sequencing. (The firm that created Deck and the companion MIDI program, Metro--OSC--was loopy to ever sell out, with Deck going to one company and Metro to another; if they'd ever integrated the two, they would have had a real contender in the DAW wars, and would have inherited Vision's place. But that's Mac history. And the twain, now, shall never meet. Deck is always going to have a very limited market unless Bias does something to add MIDI support. This commentary is free of charge. ![]() Now with Cubase SX just days away, and Digital Performer for OS X purportedly coming in November, we might just actually be peering at the Promised Land. In fact, when just one of the major audio/MIDI DAW packages actually does make it possible to fold in output from, e.g., just Reason, alone, it is going to be one powerhouse system, a tour de force, a pip. So I'll stir the pot. I'll clang the bell. I'll keep the heat on high, because I do think it's a crime the way the whole changeover to OS X was handled, especially for us poor mistreated musicians. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Réponse(s)
![]()
Message
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Groupe : Members Messages : 296 Inscrit : 10 août 02 Lieu : Rimghobb - UA Membre no 6,734 ![]() |
QUOTE (filarion @ Oct 3 2002, 09:50) My guess is that Yamaha's dev team is half-assed and reluctant to start an industry-wide initiative that actually gets things done. ...I don't know if I'm just misinformed, but there never was a big push towards m-lan, clearly stating the advantages (kinda like with them AUs ![]() Saying Yamaha's mLan dev team is half-assed is, I think, giving them credit for about 3/4 more than they deserve. ![]() I've been following mLan development (well, trying to follow: it hasn't moved) ever since the first big hoo-hah years ago. But as far as I can tell, it's just firewire with another name stuck on it. Of course trying to get sufficient information is like trying to find the Holy Grail, but I suppose it *could* be something as boneheaded as MOTU's "AudioWire," in which they took a perfectly wonderful standard like firewire and perverted it into something proprietary. (I *finally* cornered one of the MOTU tech people into *finally* admitting that it was nothing but firewire cabling; it's what *they* are doing with the signal on each end that *prevents* their "AudioWire" products from being used with firewire ports. Welcome to the wonderful world of marketing.) Well, I hear lepetitmartien coming up behind me with his Off Topic stick, so I'm outta' here ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet















![]() ![]() |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
