Hard Drive. Help Requested, Newbie enquiry |
|
|
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
mer. 15 févr. 2006, 18:44
|

Rookie

Groupe : Members
Messages : 38
Inscrit : 21 janv. 05
Lieu : East Lansing - US
Membre no 58,914

|
You are right, looking at specs, mixfisto, firewire should be slower (400 mbps compared to USB2's 480mbps). But there are some other issues at play. In the firewire architecture both the device and the computer work to find a solution to comon file transfer problems (packet loss, other hickups etc.). Each device (your computer and external harddrive) works co-opperatively. BUT USB works as a master-slave relationship. The PC does all the error handling and processing of bandwith issues. This is not the only reasons but just one of the reasons that USB hits the CPU alot harder than Firewire. Take a look at this link for some real world test data: http://www.barefeats.com/usb2.html
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
Foxyphil Hard Drive. Help Requested mar. 14 févr. 2006, 21:30 mixfisto Foxy, as far as the size of the hard drive is conc... mar. 14 févr. 2006, 22:50 Foxyphil Thx for that Mix. Valuable feedback.
Cheers man.... mer. 15 févr. 2006, 01:32 lepetitmartien If the final use is to be 44.1, keep at 44.1 or 88... mer. 15 févr. 2006, 12:50 bcatcho lepetitmartien, thats the laziest defrag process e... mer. 15 févr. 2006, 17:43 mixfisto bcathco, firewire is actually "slower" t... mer. 15 févr. 2006, 18:08 lepetitmartien USB2 is faster on paper, but is a mess like other ... jeu. 16 févr. 2006, 01:19 Mac Daddy lepetitmartien
I become smarter each time you tra... jeu. 16 févr. 2006, 16:07 cornutt Hmm, did the Mac OSX drive format incorporate the ... ven. 17 févr. 2006, 06:09 lepetitmartien Standard drive format is HFS+ which is not BSD at ... ven. 17 févr. 2006, 12:38
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|