|
![Reply to this topic](style_images/fr/t_reply.gif) ![Start new topic](style_images/fr/t_new.gif) |
2nd Mic For One Source, things to consider |
|
|
|
lun. 26 août 2002, 18:43
|
![](http://en.440forums.com/forums/uploads/av-3984.gif)
Maniac Member
![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif)
Groupe : Members
Messages : 799
Inscrit : 24 mars 02
Lieu : Entre-Deux-Mers - FR
Membre no 3,984
![](style_images/fr/spacer.gif)
|
What I'm asking about is possible technical problems (such as phase) using 2 mics on the same source. While I'm at it, I should specify that I don't mean placing techniques for stereo considerations.
I can't say I'm not interested in the relative qualities of mics (for baby to adult voices, also various noises), but that's not what I'm asking about here.
(Off topic: I tried the SM57 with an imic, Recordit, and no pre! - the result was shitty. I now use the NT2 with an Mbox and Beyer DT250 phones and the sounds I hear seem undistorted, crystal clear, and loud - wonderful to me. Still, I'd need to borrow other mics to compare. We should push the Parisian MacMusians to get together with their various mics and to write us a comparative article)
--------------------
Without shit, we wouldn't be here ;)
|
|
|
|
|
lun. 26 août 2002, 21:12
|
![](http://en.440forums.com/forums/uploads/av-1082.jpg)
Maniac Member
![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif) ![*](style_images/fr/pip.gif)
Groupe : Members
Messages : 821
Inscrit : 25 juin 01
Lieu : Springfield - US
Membre no 1,082
![](style_images/fr/spacer.gif)
|
QUOTE (Off topic: I tried the SM57 with an imic, Recordit, and no pre! - the result was shitty. I now use the NT2 with an Mbox and Beyer DT250 phones and the sounds I hear seem undistorted, crystal clear, and loud - wonderful to me. Still, I'd need to borrow other mics to compare. We should push the Parisian MacMusians to get together with their various mics and to write us a comparative article) Well you went from $40 imic to $500 Mbox which may account for some of the difference in sound quality I am not sure I would trust the imic for quality anyhow so it may not totally have been the SM57 at fault. I have used the SM57 a few times with vocals and bass on my Digi001 with ok results. Wasn't superb but wasn't really crappy either. Getting opinions on mics is nice but I have a feeling that it may not totally give an accurate view of actual performance. The reason I say this is gathered from reading many articles in Electronic Musician, The Mix, TapeOp, and ReMix magazines. It seems there are some mics that are favorites but everyone seems to have different opinions for the most part about which mic is best suited for what type of recording. It would be interesting to see the results though. Ad for the phasing concerns... that's a good question. That may be a trial and error tupe of thing unless someone happens to use a NT2 with another mic as well. I think the phasing should be really close if mic'ed from near the same position from the sound source but my mic experience is more from reading than using
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
![Reply to this topic](style_images/fr/t_reply.gif) ![Start new topic](style_images/fr/t_new.gif) |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|