MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés

JParker

Profil
Photo personnelle
Avatar
Members

Newbie
Note
 
Options
Options
Pro Infos

Techniciens / Ingénieurs du son - Musique

Infos personnelles
Sexe non défini
Né(e) le 8 Sep. 1974 (50 ans)
27403 Greensboro
Etats-unis
JParker n'a pas de présentation personnelle pour le moment.
Statistiques
Inscrit : 30 juil. 05
Vus : 2,714*
Dernière visite : lundi 1 août 2005, 20:39
Heure locale : dim. 3 nov. 2024, 12:10
1 message(s) (0 par jour)
Contact
AIM Aucune information
Yahoo Aucune information
ICQ Aucune information
MSN Aucune information
* Le compteur est mis à jour chaque heure
Sujets
Messages
Blog
Commentaires
Amis
Mon contenu
30 Jul 2005
So I just upgraded my G4 AGP 400 again from a Sonnet 800 card to a Powerlogix dual 1.2 based on the 7447 chip. I had originally ordered a dual 1.0 G4 based on the 7455 chip but it was backordered and I needed something quickly as I am in the middle of mixing a project for which I needed more power. The dual 1.0 upgrade had a 256k L2 cache and a 2MB L3 cache. The 1.2 that I ended up getting has a 512k L2 cache and no L3 cache. My question is this: would the dual 1.0 have given me significantly more power in Logic Pro due to the L3 cache than the dual 1.2 I am currently using. I am under the impression that the L3 cache can do a bit to alleviate the bottleneck of the 100mHz system bus on my G4 but is it something that i will really notice a difference in? I have a 30 day money back guarantee on this card and I am wondering if I should get the dual 1.0 that I originally wanted when it comes in. Thanks to anyone who has any insight into this matter.
Derniers visiteurs
JParker n'a aucun visiteur à afficher..

Commentaires
Les autres utilisateurs n'ont laissé aucun commentaire pour JParker.

Amis
Il n'y a aucun ami à afficher.
Version bas débit - dimanche 3 nov. 2024, 13:10
- © 440 Forums 2011