|
Which Format Do You Record In? And Why?, .wav, .aif, .sd2 ??? |
|
|
|
jeu. 4 nov. 2004, 11:33
|
Moderator
Groupe : Team
Messages : 370
Inscrit : 19 mars 03
Lieu : Umeå - SE
Membre no 14,645
|
Whatever format my apps work with. Convert them later if I have to.
Cheers: Dixiechicken
--------------------
================== Oh my god it's full of stars… --------------------------------------------------- Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs, Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V Emes Kobalt monitors ================================
|
|
|
|
|
ven. 5 nov. 2004, 14:13
|
Moderator
Groupe : Team
Messages : 370
Inscrit : 19 mars 03
Lieu : Umeå - SE
Membre no 14,645
|
You must make a separation between regular audio-files like *:aif or *.wav or *.mp3.
and audio-files/soundbites from an sequenser /DAW such as DP-4 or Logic (whatever format Logic uses).
The soundbites from (sound designer format ?) DP-4 also contains meta data such as edits performed or tempo information and perhaps other region-info as well.
These kind of aufio-files are not directly compatible/comparable with aif and wav files as an example.
Most DAW:s and serveral other programs can export and comvert between various formats though.
Cheers: Dixiechicken
--------------------
================== Oh my god it's full of stars… --------------------------------------------------- Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs, Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V Emes Kobalt monitors ================================
|
|
|
|
|
ven. 5 nov. 2004, 16:50
|
Webmaster
Groupe : Admin
Messages : 3,204
Inscrit : 29 oct. 00
Lieu : Sommieres - FR
Membre no 11
|
Not having to convert between formats when you want to use your samples in any application is really confortable and creative... On Mac, AIFF is nowadays defacto the best compatible format. SOme apps read wavs, others (rarest on OSX) read sd2, but all read AIFF. Also the advantage of AIFF versus SD2 is that both formats can store regions definitions inside the audio file, but only AIFF can store the base note of your sample, which is really convenient when you import a muilti sample instrument on a virtual sampler which smartly recognize theses base note informations encoded inside the AIFF files to automatically spread your samples on the keyboard map.
AIFF is the right choice if you want to avoid spending time to convert samples before being able to use them, and to offer the most features. IMHO, the less time you spend on technic (converting, importing...) , the more time you can spend to be creative, which is the essence of music.
Of course, if you are working on a multiplatofrm environnement , often switching between macs and PCs, WAV would be the best choice.
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 17 nov. 2004, 00:25
|
Advanced Member
Groupe : Members
Messages : 393
Inscrit : 11 juin 02
Lieu : London - UK
Membre no 5,044
|
also, sd11, nowadays, is almost exclusively a pro-tools format, in as much as it's the only format that treats stereo files as dual mono/split stereo! so, if you're using pro-tools hardware, this is the format for you, otherwise aiff (audio interchangeable file format) is the most universal presuming that you use a mac...
Ce message a été modifié par damann - mer. 17 nov. 2004, 00:32.
--------------------
one for all and all for one...
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|