MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Anyone Here Using Metro 6 ( Mac Version )
macmidiguy
posté dim. 22 mai 2005, 20:05
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Validating
Messages : 22
Inscrit : 16 déc. 04
Lieu : Ed - CA
Membre no 56,767




If you are using Metro 6 what are likes and dislikes about this midi/audio sequencer?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gkdoty
posté lun. 23 mai 2005, 06:12
Message #2


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 22
Inscrit : 18 déc. 02
Lieu : Lithia Springs - US
Membre no 10,159




I have been using Metro 6 since it was available.
It continues to be my Audio/Midi production tool.
I have Pro Tools LE with a M-Box and it a great program, I still use Metro 6 as my primary tool for recording. I can import all of my tracks to Pro Tools if need be.
I find that Metro 6 serves me extremely well.

Gary K. Doty Sr.

Ce message a été modifié par gkdoty - lun. 23 mai 2005, 06:18.


--------------------
1.25mhz MacMini--OS X 10.4.3-Metro 6.3.3--M-Audio keystation 49e--Oxygen 8 Controller--M-audio Firewire Solo--Fernandez Strat--Fender Jazz Bass--Fender Precision bass--Epiphone Acoustic--Roland MA-12 Micro Powered Monitors
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kaboombahchuck
posté lun. 23 mai 2005, 09:15
Message #3


Advanced Member
*****

Groupe : Members
Messages : 495
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Chandler - US
Membre no 2,003




I really cant think of any disslikes.. I am now using Metro 6.3 full version. Any problems I have ran arcross have been rapidly fixed, many times fixed before I find a problem. The program works well with other aps, and hardware.


--------------------
kaboombahchuck
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Delso
posté lun. 23 mai 2005, 09:51
Message #4


Rookie
*

Groupe : Members
Messages : 48
Inscrit : 20 févr. 04
Lieu : LONDON - UK
Membre no 36,390




These last two guys convinced me to give Metro LX a try. I liked the ease of use of the demo, so bought the full version.
I'm still learning my way round it, but I put down a MIDI track, imported an audio file and laid down a vocal in about ten minutes, on my first attempt!
It's incredible value for money and any other stuff like particular samples or synth modules, you can add to suit yourself and your budget. The big name DAQW tend to come loaded to the gunwales with VSTi and FX, which you may never use.

Oh, and the help is outstanding!

Ce message a été modifié par Adrian Delso - lun. 23 mai 2005, 09:52.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Metro SE
posté lun. 23 mai 2005, 16:08
Message #5


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 70
Inscrit : 01 juil. 03
Lieu : Framingham - US
Membre no 20,523




Hello MacMIDIGuy,

The best thing for you to do is try it out for yourself. You can download the demo HERE!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cornutt
posté lun. 23 mai 2005, 19:33
Message #6


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 53
Inscrit : 10 févr. 02
Lieu : Huntsville, AL
Membre no 3,371




I've been using Metro (and its predecessor, Beyond) for over ten years and I can't say enough good about it. Everything you need for any studio short of a full-up NY/LA job is there. The price is right, even for the full version. The support is great -- Jeremy Sagan, the author, is very active on the forms on Metro's Web site. He finds and fixes bugs, and puts out point releases for them, usually in days. And it's the only sequencing app I know of that accepts both VST and AU plug-ins natively.


--------------------
Dave Cornutt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
infotech
posté lun. 27 nov. 2006, 22:47
Message #7


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 2
Inscrit : 27 nov. 06
Lieu : Ashland - US
Membre no 85,712




The program is great but the only problem I have had is with the registration. I am the IT support guy for a university and when we tried to implent Metro 6 in a lab setting using images, the registration gave us hell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kaboombahchuck
posté mer. 29 nov. 2006, 16:15
Message #8


Advanced Member
*****

Groupe : Members
Messages : 495
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Chandler - US
Membre no 2,003




I hope you contacted Jerm on this. His is always more than willing to correct any issue, and or help out. I always go to the Metro Forums for all the help I need.


--------------------
kaboombahchuck
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fastlanephil
posté lun. 7 mai 2007, 04:07
Message #9


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 94
Inscrit : 21 déc. 02
Lieu : Shelton - US
Membre no 10,225




I started using Metro(full version) when Cakewalk had it. I was thinking I would eventually move "up" to DP but for what I do, which is compose, it has more than enough power. It's best feature is the way it works with sections which can be spliced together in the main section while you are still working on individual subsections. It has so many features I imagine I still haven't tapped them all. On the midi side it is probably as good or better than any sequencer out there for the Mac.

Also, Metro itself is very easy on the CPU. It's worked with every plugin so far as either a VST, an AU or both.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Bienvenue invité
Contribute
PcMusic est VOTRE site! Participez à son évolution...
Version bas débit - vendredi 27 déc. 2024, 07:02
- © PcMusic 1997-2007