MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Machine Opinion, Will a power book have enough power?
cmoody29
posté sam. 15 mars 2003, 22:31
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 3
Inscrit : 15 mars 03
Lieu : Midlothian - US
Membre no 14,418




I'm getting ready to upgrade from a B/W G3 350. I would like to run Reason 2.0 and Cubase SX w/ Rewire (OS X). I'm debating between a dual 1.25 Mac and an 876 mhz or 1 gig Powerbook. Has anyone worked with either of these setups? I'm thinking about going portable because we have a baby on the way and I don't want to be making a lot of noise at home (I have about 3 hours to kill between shows on my gig and it would be great to get some work done.)

Thanks for any input.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
posté sam. 15 mars 2003, 23:24
Message #2


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Icône de groupe

Groupe : Editors
Messages : 15,189
Inscrit : 23 déc. 01
Lieu : Paris - FR
Membre no 2,758




The first thing to think about between desktop and laptop is the the former is usually more expensive and a bit less powerfull. So the choice for a Powerbook needs to be motivated only if you know that you need to be really mobile.
The dual 1,25 will be way more powerfull, expandable.

Now for a Reason/SX setup it depend also of what kind of things you do with.

Do you want to run loads of plugins? VSTis?


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MacMaui
posté dim. 16 mars 2003, 04:25
Message #3


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 3
Inscrit : 21 févr. 03
Lieu : Wailuku - US
Membre no 12,847




QUOTE
The first thing to think about between desktop and laptop is the the former is usually more expensive and a bit less powerfull.


I'm pretty sure that you mean the "latter" (the laptop), don't you?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gidfiddler
posté dim. 16 mars 2003, 06:23
Message #4


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 18
Inscrit : 09 janv. 03
Lieu : North Cairns - AU
Membre no 10,612




I tried a dual 1.2 with a 20" monitor in a shop . it only had 256 megs ram . I have to say it was the fastest most responsive machine I have tried . really slick .
there wasn't much background noise in the shop it seemed really quite to me . this was a big problem with old desktops .
unless you require portablility I would go with something like this . they are just much more powerful versatile machines and will serve you for longer time .

the other thing is only buy when you have the time to use , because if you buy it later you will get cheaper or more powerful machine for same money .

if you need portability buy 2nd hand laptop and have good desktop as well .

good luck .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lepetitmartien
posté dim. 16 mars 2003, 15:06
Message #5


Moderator In Chief (MIC)
Icône de groupe

Groupe : Editors
Messages : 15,189
Inscrit : 23 déc. 01
Lieu : Paris - FR
Membre no 2,758




Thanks Macmaui spot on! wink.gif

Methink it was time to bo to bed wink.gif


--------------------
Our Classifeds • Nos petites annoncesTerms Of Service / Conditions d'UtilisationForum Rules / Règles des ForumsMacMusic.Org & SETI@Home
BOING BUMM TSCHAK PENG! Are you musician enough to write in our Wiki?
BOING BUMM TSCHAK ZZZZZZZZZZZOING! Êtes-vous assez musicien pour écrire dans le Wiki?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
posté mer. 19 mars 2003, 03:42
Message #6


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 899
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Kirkland
Membre no 2,002




cool.gif

I think gidfiddler is on track, if you are a business I'd suggest a desktop first.
If you encounter common hardware problems, with a desktop, parts may be available at any computer shop.
The components in laptops are more specialized or proprietary, and your only repair option may be a return to Apple, or an authorized dealer.

If a hardrive fails in my desktop, in ten minutes I can go to CompUSA and be up and running in less than an hour. But if your hardrive dies on a laptop it's a trip to the shop.

For my business, I would use a laptop as a secondary machine.

I'm in the decision making process now for a laptop.
smile.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cmoody29
posté mer. 19 mars 2003, 05:35
Message #7


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 3
Inscrit : 15 mars 03
Lieu : Midlothian - US
Membre no 14,418




Thanks for all the useful input. I think I've settled on the dual 1.25.

Chris rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rickenbacker
posté jeu. 20 mars 2003, 11:51
Message #8


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 645
Inscrit : 17 mai 02
Lieu : Broughton
Membre no 4,705




I'll just mention that you can still get 1.25 DP Macs that boot into OS 9. They cost a little more, but if you think you might want the safety net of being able to boot into OS 9 sometimes they might be worth a look.

Not that Apple make them easy to find: you have to go to the Apple Store and select the PowerMacs link, so you get the page with the four latest models on. Then in the top-right-hand corner is a link that says "OS 9 systems". Click that and you get a choice of two machines: the devil is in the detail, but in some respects they're better specced than the equivalent OS X-only machines. cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - mardi 17 sept. 2024, 19:45
- © MacMusic 1997-2008