MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Edirol Ua-20 Vs M-audio Audiophile 24/96 For Osx, unsure which budget card to get
chris72
posté mer. 9 avril 2003, 11:34
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 1
Inscrit : 08 avril 03
Lieu : Taroona - AU
Membre no 15,734
hi,

I am tossing up between buying either a edirol ua-20 vs m-audio audiophile 24/96 for OSX,as a busget recording solution, i only want to record guitar tracks one at a time from an amp modeller (v-amp2) and was wondering if anyone had a suggestion as which way to go? I am using reason & recycle but will need to use some sort of OSX software to record into. The m-audio thing comes bundled with a basic verson of reason, is this a good thing? Are Edirols osx drivers capable of recording to 24 bit? Can the eridol record at 96 like the m-audio.

Both units are the same price in Australia and i am not sure which way to go, any help would be greatly appreciated

cheers chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alcolo
posté dim. 13 avril 2003, 21:13
Message #2


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 20
Inscrit : 09 avril 03
Lieu : Mch - ID
Membre no 15,827
Hi!

Please see below some info about the UA-20:

"EDIROL
UA-20

EDIROL UA-20 USB audio interface, signal processing in24Bit/ 44.1 + 48kHz and 48 kHz, line and guitar/microphoneinput, headphone output, MIDI In/Out, incl. ASIO +WDM-Drivers, PC and Mac "


bye,

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 
Bienvenue invité
Contribute
PcMusic est VOTRE site! Participez à son évolution...
Version bas débit - lundi 23 déc. 2024, 12:22
Powered By IP.Board © 2024  IPS, Inc.
- © PcMusic 1997-2007