|
Studio Projects C1 Vs Audio Technia At4040, Which one for my saffire??? |
|
|
|
sam. 18 mars 2006, 14:02
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 8
Inscrit : 12 janv. 06
Lieu : Melbourne - AU
Membre no 75,204
|
Hi all! I've heard all about the C1 sounding like a U87 (i have no idea what that sounds like, but it sounds like it sounds good ) But I've also read good reviews about the AT4040 and i think it looks better and more 'trustable' Opinions please! ANY opinons welcome Im going to use it with a saffire for recording my voice (male vocals)
|
|
|
|
2 Pages
< 1 2
|
|
Réponse(s)
(10 - 10)
|
ven. 14 juil. 2006, 17:46
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 8
Inscrit : 19 févr. 05
Lieu : Chicago - US
Membre no 60,926
|
The C1 (and the U87) often excel on smooth female voices, since the high end is very flattering, but as soon as you switch to someone with a thin voice, watch out because you're going to end up emphasizing the wrong frequencies.
I have a Studio Projects C3 (haven't heard the C1, but it's got to be reasonably similar), and as certain registers of my voice sound a bit thin, I do sometimes feel it's emphasizing the wrong frequencies. Edge--if you happen to come by here again, can you recommend any mics in the $250-$350 range that DO work if your voice is a bit thin?
And to offer something to the original thread starter, I found adding a mic pre to the C3 made it sound MUCH better. I was originally using the pres on my Firebox (probably not extremely different than the Saphire), and getting a Groove Tubes Brick fattened it up and gave it a beautiful sheen. The VTB1 (which I considered buying) is supposed to be pretty good by most accounts.
PS: That lower-end Presonus (the TubePre?) has gotten some pretty mixed reviews--a lot of people cite its noise level as being too high.
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|