MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Speakers Vs Studio Monitors, Speakers vs studio monitors
brianjones
posté mer. 7 déc. 2005, 15:15
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 15
Inscrit : 01 déc. 05
Lieu : Kingston - JM
Membre no 73,267




What is the difference between speakers and studio monitors?

I want to buy something for my iMac studio but do not know if I should be buying a sound surround type system, adding a sub woofer as opposed to buying two speakers/studio monitors.

Any suggestions as to what speakers/monitors I could buy if using my iMac as a studio where I plan to mix the vocals and rhythm.

Thanks
Brian
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glenc
posté mer. 7 déc. 2005, 21:30
Message #2


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 3
Inscrit : 19 avril 05
Lieu : London - UK
Membre no 64,387




Basically, hi-fi speakers are designed to make music sound exciting. Any manufacturer who makes them is trying to make them sound more "exciting" than the next company, in terms of perceived dynamics (how loud things leap out at you), loudness (by eq'ing the speakers to make the most of their instrinsic power) and by appealing to most people's hi-fi needs (by accentuating the part of the sonic spectrum covered by the human voice).

This colours the basic signal in a way that you ought not to have to consider when you're mixing. Monitors are much less exciting: they give you the whole sonic spectrum in a much more "as-is" way. For instance, the old studio-staple monitors Yamaha NS-10's are both loved, and despised, for their lack of excitement (but mainly for their lack of bottom end, but that's another story): if you can make your music sound great on them, it'll sound amazing on anyone's home system, whether a kitchen radio or a hi-fi geek's set-up.

When it comes to surround systems, I know people who mix on inexpensive Alesis 5.1 speakers, even though they have more expensive stereo monitoring systems, such as PMC's, or those wonderfully transparent Mackie HR824's. Genelec used to do a blinding 5.1 system for about £1000 (roughly $2000), but the Alesis will only set you back $300, and they will be perfectly adequate if you position them well. Just remember that the difference between monitors and speakers is the difference between clarity and flattery.

Good luck!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UP Multimedia
posté jeu. 8 déc. 2005, 13:48
Message #3


Rookie
*

Groupe : Members
Messages : 44
Inscrit : 14 sept. 05
Lieu : Hamburg - DE
Membre no 69,997




That was great advice. I especially liked: difference between monitors and speakers is the difference between clarity and flattery.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gdoubleyou
posté jeu. 8 déc. 2005, 23:37
Message #4


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 899
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Kirkland
Membre no 2,002




Monitors are designed to tell you the truth, also like optical lens, speakers have a focal point. For hi-fi speakers the focal point is usally 10-15 feet from the grillecloth. Near-field montiors have a focal point that appears just infront of the grillecloth so the stereo field appears in front of you, insted of being imbedded in the wall behind you.

cool.gif


--------------------
G-Dub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - vendredi 29 nov. 2024, 19:00
- © 440 Forums 2011