MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Edirol Fa 66 Reviews?
don says mac
posté mar. 5 avril 2005, 16:54
Message #1


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 69
Inscrit : 26 sept. 03
Lieu : Toronto - CA
Membre no 25,510




hey,

Gonna need a new interface when I upgrade to a G5... I'm looking at the Edirol FA 66 & the Presonus Firebox. I'm using Logic 7. I know there's the thread regarding the Presonus, but anyone have an FA66?

Thanks,
d
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
primeclub
posté jeu. 28 juil. 2005, 14:43
Message #2


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 2
Inscrit : 28 juil. 05
Lieu : Amsterdam - NL
Membre no 68,235




no one?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jsegura
posté jeu. 28 juil. 2005, 15:15
Message #3


Moderator
Icône de groupe

Groupe : Team
Messages : 336
Inscrit : 17 févr. 05
Lieu : La Laguna - ES
Membre no 60,731




Presonus is good. Edirol is a second mark of Roland. I don't like.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ideaslinger
posté mer. 10 août 2005, 09:09
Message #4


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 5
Inscrit : 04 juil. 05
Lieu : Paris - FR
Membre no 67,424




Just installed an Edirol FA101... apart from the obvious I'm not sure what the differences are on the FA66 anyway...

Super simple installation on the Mac (class compliant - no drivers needed)... sounds sweet so far and no problems... I like the hard switch sample rate setting etc...

Only have two minor gripes. The first is that the two Neutrik's on the front are kinda hard wired (hi-z/lo-z) which means that input 1 is designed for mic and 2 is mic/instrument but switchable... nearly all my apps look for my guitar on line 1 by default. Woulda been nice if both 1/2 were switchable but, I realise, it's a minor quibble.

Only other minor downside is the Firewire chain... the FA101 doesn't seem to like additional high bandwidth devices and sometimes will cut out if a new drive comes online. This usually means a quick power cycle and it's fine again but a minor gripe...

Other than that it's compact and efficient and I like it. biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
macmusicpd
posté mer. 17 août 2005, 23:06
Message #5


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 18
Inscrit : 25 nov. 03
Lieu : California - US
Membre no 29,613




I've been thinking about getting the FA 66 too. How many separate audio tracks can it record simultaneously, 2 or 6?

I find all the promotion on audio interfaces to be confusing. "This unit has one billion inputs and can interface with a blender." Well, or something like that. Anyone else find it confusing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hugo Cole
posté mer. 17 août 2005, 23:20
Message #6


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 20
Inscrit : 17 août 05
Lieu : Montreal - CA
Membre no 68,864




Hi

I am also deciding between the fa-66 and the firebox. One thing the fa-66 has is a grounded turntable input, which has got me thinking about transferring vinyl to digital. To do this on the firebox will require a turntable preamp (thought i'm not sure how good the one in the fa-66 is in comparison to what i might buy).

Despite this, I have been considerering getting the firebox because i can find no reviews of the fa-66 online. One concern I have, though, is comments I've seen alluding to the firebox having "no midi" or problems with midi. I have an older Yamaha XG keyboard and plan to connect it through the midi ins. Is this not going to work? I am a novice in this game, but I plan to run both through a G5. Can anyone help?

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Bienvenue invité
Contribute
PcMusic est VOTRE site! Participez à son évolution...
Version bas débit - mardi 24 déc. 2024, 01:46
- © PcMusic 1997-2007