Idrum Rtas Plugin Problems |
mer. 17 nov. 2004, 11:01
Message
#1
|
|
Rookie Groupe : Members Messages : 36 Inscrit : 13 janv. 04 Lieu : Toulouse - FR Membre no 33,075 |
As an existing iDRUM user (in Audio Unit format) but primarily a Pro Tools user, I was glad to see Glaresoft release an RTAS version of their excellent little drum machine for use directly in PTLE.
However, after installing the RTAS plug-in (Version 1.03) AND installing (as per the installation notes) the Main installer 1.01 downloaded from my idrum account I have the following problems: When selecting the RTAS plugin within ProTools I get an error message stating something about the GSPlug and an error at line 587 (cannot remember the exact wording) followed by an error message related to authorisation/expiry of demo period. However, I do not have any demo versions installed (because I deleted them when I installed the full Audio Unit version). I have not had any problems with the Audio Unit version. - Has anyone got the RTAS plugin version to work? |
|
|
jeu. 18 nov. 2004, 22:40
Message
#2
|
|
Member Groupe : Members Messages : 79 Inscrit : 23 janv. 04 Lieu : Dublin - IE Membre no 33,924 |
I'm not a ProTools users but a DP4.5 user happily using iDrum. I strongly suggest that you visit:
http://www.glaresoft.com/support/index.html ...and check out the FAQ. If there's no help for your particular problem in it, send an email to tech support (there's a link on this page). You will find them to be extremely responsive and helpful. I know I certainly did when I had problems. Best of luck. -------------------- Dave Bourke
- ideation - |
|
|
ven. 19 nov. 2004, 14:37
Message
#3
|
|
Rookie Groupe : Members Messages : 36 Inscrit : 13 janv. 04 Lieu : Toulouse - FR Membre no 33,075 |
Just to complete this thread in case any other Pro Tools users run into trouble, I have been e-mailed by Glaresoft support (who responded very quickly after I sent them the crash logs) and they state that there is an updated version of iDRUM 1.03 (specifically for the RTAS plugin) which should now work without any of the problems I outlined above.
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :