Loading... visiteurs connectés
tunepoet
Profil
Sexe non défini
Né(e) le 2 Avr. 1967
(57 ans)
94903 San Rafael
Etats-unis
tunepoet n'a pas de présentation personnelle pour le moment.
Inscrit : 17 juin 03
Vus : 2,780*
Dernière visite : jeudi 5 avril 2007, 23:47
Heure locale : mar. 19 nov. 2024, 04:24
50 message(s) (0,01 par jour)
Aucune information
Aucune information
Aucune information
Aucune information
* Le compteur est mis à jour chaque heure
|
Sujets
Messages
Blog
Amis
Mon contenu
This may be a redundant question (most of them are), but if you are a person who enjoys giving advice on the matter, your help is much appreciated. Heyo, I have been using an eMac 700 now, for a time, but my software has so out powered my rig, that I am looking into purchasing a G5. But from there, I do not know which of the G5 Towers would be the wisest to purchase. What I would like to do is pile up loads of soft synths in my sequencers, and never fear that my processor is gonna go on a coffee break. I have heard that you can run a large numbers of plug-in’s on even the 1.8 G5, so, with that in mind, would there be a reason I should choose the 2.5 G5 tower instead? The take no chances approach would dictate the 2.5, but would that be over kill? Is there anyone here who has run multiple instances of Reaktor or Tassman, or other mega hungry programs on the 1.8, and felt they would never need any more power than that? And is there a discernible difference in performance between the 1.8, the 2.0, and the 2.5 G5? Thanks for your help. Blessings, Damon
|
Derniers visiteurs
tunepoet n'a aucun visiteur à afficher..
Amis
Il n'y a aucun ami à afficher.
|
|
|
|
|