MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés

Jay Nuno

Profil
Photo personnelle
Avatar
Members

Newbie
Note
 
Options
Options
Pro Infos

Musiciens / Réalisateurs

Infos personnelles
Sexe non défini
Anniversaire inconnu
Jay Nuno n'a pas de présentation personnelle pour le moment.
Statistiques
Inscrit : 04 janv. 05
Vus : 1,418*
Dernière visite : jeudi 9 sept. 2010, 03:04
Heure locale : ven. 29 mars 2024, 13:43
4 message(s) (0 par jour)
Contact
AIM Aucune information
Yahoo Aucune information
ICQ Aucune information
MSN Aucune information
* Le compteur est mis à jour chaque heure
Sujets
Messages
Blog
Commentaires
Amis
Mon contenu
6 Oct 2005
Advice please...

Seagate
Buffer to/from Host (max.): 150 Mbytes/s
Average Seek Time: 8.5s

Samsung
Buffer to/from Host (max.): 300Mbytes/s
Average Seek Time: 8.9s

---

Bearing in mind they're similar in everything (8MB cache, 7200 rpm, and roughly the same price) other then the specs above, which 160GB SATA drive would you go to for audio work?
I only need it for recording no more then ten tracks at a time (44.1/24) using Pro Tools LE 6.9 (Digi 002) + Mac G5 2.5 Dual.

Basically, what's more important? Buffer handling or Average Seek Time?

If you guys have some other thoughts to share - like noise and reliability - please do it...!

BTW... although I've always heard that Average Seek Time is what matters the most, I would guess the Samsung offers better performance cause the AST difference is very small, and the Buffer capacity of the Samsung is much higher, but would it be as reliable as the Seagate... I never had problems with the Seagates I owned in the past, and never used Samsung...

Thanks in advance...
19 Sep 2005
Dear all, please help me if you can...

I'm running a G5 / 2.5 Dual Processor under Mac OS 10.3.8, and I recently lost data.
In fact, I can't remember erasing it, but I assume I did it cause I can't find the files.
I'm talking about 1.50Gb. I may have erased the folder that contained it all. But it's strange cause it was important data to me, and I dont think I would erase it by mistake.
Can data disappear because of some disc fault or something?

Anyway, let's get to the point.
As I haven't writen anything after I noticed that they had disappeared (on the partition the files were in), I tried to recover them using Techtool Pro 4.3.
The result of my attempt was a 4.61Gb file called 2Z694-5064.dmg.
But when I double-click it, I get a window saying: "The following disk image failed to mount. Reason: No mountable file systems."
Unfortunatelly I'm bot surprised, as I've been told that Techtool is just as good as Norton's bull shit.

So then I contacted a few companies in the UK who specialize in recovering data.
But they charge a lot of money! And although the data is important, it's not worth what they charge.
Having said that I'd still like to get it, and I've been reluctunt to use that 70Gb partition while I'm not totally convinced that there's no cheap way around it.

I've also been told that the fact that Mac OS 10 is based on Linux makes it very hard to recover deleted files... I have no idea why...

Is there antone who could help...?

Thanks...!
Derniers visiteurs
Jay Nuno n'a aucun visiteur à afficher..

Commentaires
Les autres utilisateurs n'ont laissé aucun commentaire pour Jay Nuno.

Amis
Il n'y a aucun ami à afficher.
Version bas débit - vendredi 29 mars 2024, 13:43
- © 440 Forums 2011