MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Protools with external synths and samplers
David Levine
posté dim. 17 févr. 2002, 22:33
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 1
Inscrit : 17 févr. 02
Lieu : New York.
Membre no 3,455




I'm using protools le on my mac. I want to start using synths and samplers, and my question is, should I just get some hardware (say, the Yamaha RS7000 & a keyboard), and run it into my Digi 001 box, or should I keep the whole thing virtual and get a computer-based synth and sampler? What are the advantages and disadvantages? Are there any computer synths/samplers that are directly compatible with protools?

Any advice would be appreciated.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
posté lun. 18 févr. 2002, 00:28
Message #2





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




Unity DS-1 from Bitheadz works pretty well with the Digi001. You can download a demo from their website. Be sure to give yourself a block of time to get it working.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gio
posté lun. 18 févr. 2002, 12:56
Message #3


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 10
Inscrit : 29 mai 01
Lieu : Ligornetto
Membre no 743




try the koblo studio 9000 as well
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synthetic
posté lun. 18 févr. 2002, 17:15
Message #4


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 821
Inscrit : 25 juin 01
Lieu : Springfield - US
Membre no 1,082




My opinion is go with as much hardware as you can. Virtual synths and etc. are nice but they eat up cpu cycles that I like to leave open for plugs. Plus i like am playing live sets like to rely on my computer as little as possible for creating the sound. That is my 2 cents.


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gio
posté lun. 18 févr. 2002, 20:11
Message #5


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 10
Inscrit : 29 mai 01
Lieu : Ligornetto
Membre no 743




i use and luv both outboard and inboard synths/samplers

my final 2 cents: switch to VST technology, there's a lot of good free VSTi's out there!
and the PT MIDI editing et al. is crap, simply crap.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synthetic
posté sam. 23 févr. 2002, 21:30
Message #6


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 821
Inscrit : 25 juin 01
Lieu : Springfield - US
Membre no 1,082




gio, i am curious as 'what' makes PT editing crap? I am not disagreeing with you but I just want to know what it lacks. I have been using PT for a couple of years and use midi a lot but never had any problems editing midi in PT but I have heard many people claim that it isn't that great. I just want to know what makes Logic for instance better for midi editing and such than PT?


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gio
posté dim. 24 févr. 2002, 17:10
Message #7


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 10
Inscrit : 29 mai 01
Lieu : Ligornetto
Membre no 743




my daily work is based on both PT and cubase, so im probably addicted to the midi editing of cubase wink.gif that, tryin to do the same things on PT is a pain.
PT is missing of lotsa function cubase, logic or DP have. just try one of those sequencer apps and u'll see it by urself
and sometimes i feel better in the cubase audio section than in PT.
but that's just probably me, the way i work... and the fact that i started workin with cubase back in the atari days...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
posté dim. 24 févr. 2002, 20:30
Message #8





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




In my case I did my first midi stuff with Pro Tools LE and now work mostly with Digital Performer. I don't think there's anything that *I* do that I can't do on both.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synthetic
posté lun. 25 févr. 2002, 01:43
Message #9


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 821
Inscrit : 25 juin 01
Lieu : Springfield - US
Membre no 1,082




Baghun... do you have a Digi001? I was wondering if you were able to use the monitor ouputs on the Digi001 with DP? Most other music apps I have tried don't like the digidesign audio driver but if DP works with it... i may have to try that one because I have seen some nice reviews on it


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - lundi 23 déc. 2024, 04:47
- © MacMusic 1997-2008