  |
 Drum Sequencing - Digital Performer Or Different, Which software for sequencing? |
 mer. 16 août 2006, 18:08
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 10 Inscrit : 26 sept. 01 Lieu : Kutztown Membre no 1,868  |
I'm currently using a G4 833mhz processor w/ around 600MB or RAM and DP4.
The Digi001 is my audio and midi interface and up until this point I have been using it to record audio only. I now have a Yamaha S-90ES synth that I would love to use as a sound bank for midi sequencing of drum parts. Digital Performer is slowing down my performance because it does not seem that user friendly when sequencing drums. Is there something I am missing? Should it be sufficient enough and a valuable tool in sequencing drum parts? I also have a new PC in my home which I can use to record or to sequence w/ and make 1 a sequence and the other a recorder. It has x2 amd 3800 processors and 2Gig of Ram. Ideally I would stick to my Mac for everything but due to the Digi001 not being compatible w/ newer applications etc...maybe it makes sense to just use the PC? Any thoughts? |
 |
 
|
|
mer. 16 août 2006, 19:14
Message
#2
|
|
 Maniac Member  Groupe : Members Messages : 899 Inscrit : 12 oct. 01 Lieu : Kirkland Membre no 2,002 |
QUOTE (Badshirt @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 09:08)  I'm currently using a G4 833mhz processor w/ around 600MB or RAM and DP4. The Digi001 is my audio and midi interface and up until this point I have been using it to record audio only. I now have a Yamaha S-90ES synth that I would love to use as a sound bank for midi sequencing of drum parts. Digital Performer is slowing down my performance because it does not seem that user friendly when sequencing drums. Is there something I am missing? Should it be sufficient enough and a valuable tool in sequencing drum parts? I also have a new PC in my home which I can use to record or to sequence w/ and make 1 a sequence and the other a recorder. It has x2 amd 3800 processors and 2Gig of Ram. Ideally I would stick to my Mac for everything but due to the Digi001 not being compatible w/ newer applications etc...maybe it makes sense to just use the PC? Any thoughts? Try the drum editor! 
-------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 16 août 2006, 19:25
Message
#3
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 10 Inscrit : 26 sept. 01 Lieu : Kutztown Membre no 1,868 |
QUOTE (gdoubleyou @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 18:14) QUOTE (Badshirt @ Wed 16 Aug 2006, 09:08) I'm currently using a G4 833mhz processor w/ around 600MB or RAM and DP4. The Digi001 is my audio and midi interface and up until this point I have been using it to record audio only. I now have a Yamaha S-90ES synth that I would love to use as a sound bank for midi sequencing of drum parts. Digital Performer is slowing down my performance because it does not seem that user friendly when sequencing drums. Is there something I am missing? Should it be sufficient enough and a valuable tool in sequencing drum parts? I also have a new PC in my home which I can use to record or to sequence w/ and make 1 a sequence and the other a recorder. It has x2 amd 3800 processors and 2Gig of Ram. Ideally I would stick to my Mac for everything but due to the Digi001 not being compatible w/ newer applications etc...maybe it makes sense to just use the PC? Any thoughts? Try the drum editor! I've only been recording audio until this point and laid down a bit w/ the drum editor. I guess its inexperience but it seems to me like there isn't much control in editing individual tom hits. Maybe I have it configured incorrectly or need to learn the software better. |
|
|
|
|
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
