Categorisation Of Forums, Hardware is hardware |
mer. 30 oct. 2002, 12:40
Message
#1
|
|
Maniac Member Groupe : Members Messages : 799 Inscrit : 24 mars 02 Lieu : Entre-Deux-Mers - FR Membre no 3,984 |
Please give your opinion on an imminent complete re-categorisation for MacMusic forums.
Personally, I'm quite happy with a simple hardware forum separate from software issues, and I don't care if the hardware is Mac specific or not. I find it very difficult to observe the present rules where computer-specific hardware issues should be posted in OS9 or OSX (which one is not always clear). It's true there are many more posts on the French side, so I agree that more sub categories could help seeing a bit clearer. I'm happy Damann should agree with me on the hardware issue (see Mini-me topic). I was starting to wonder if my brain was just too simple. This may be a problem of culture based logic. I correct scientific articles for French researchers wishing to be published in English, and have my work cut out to get their logic simplified and clear for international readers. As my clients do get published when they use me, I presume my simplicity attitude is appropriate. We are working on a new categorisation for forums, and I do hope the anglo-saxon approach will be heard. Do say what you'd like. "Hear my cry" (Purcell) -------------------- Without shit, we wouldn't be here ;)
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
Presto Categorisation Of Forums mer. 30 oct. 2002, 12:40
damann whilst appreciating the fact that small print does... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 03:21
lepetitmartien QUOTE Yeah, agreed! one should never post anyt... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 14:19
Soif We have been working hard with lpm and other team ... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 14:28
lepetitmartien The problem with newbies we are really aware of it... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 14:36
Presto OK Let's continue with (non-francophone!... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 19:17
BusError Well, for me, it had always been rather clear from... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 20:38
lepetitmartien First OS9 is not, because Stevy said it obsolette,... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 00:13
lepetitmartien …mhhmm forgot… the subject of the hardware forum ... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 00:20
Presto Thanks Damann and BusError I don't believe w... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 14:40
Presto Boll**ks! Its coming fast. If you don... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 19:59
BusError I think the new names for the french forums are pr... dim. 3 nov. 2002, 10:31
Presto Welcome BusError. Thanks. We can propose a new a... lun. 4 nov. 2002, 16:47
kaboombahchuck Well, I'm having a bit of trouble with what al... mar. 5 nov. 2002, 13:08
Soif i agree with u kaboom, creating new forums also in... mar. 5 nov. 2002, 14:35
kaboombahchuck Well, from what I can tell so far...looks pretty g... mer. 6 nov. 2002, 00:10
damann whilst appreciating the fact that small print does... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 03:21
lepetitmartien QUOTE Yeah, agreed! one should never post anyt... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 14:19
Soif We have been working hard with lpm and other team ... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 14:28
lepetitmartien The problem with newbies we are really aware of it... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 14:36
Presto OK Let's continue with (non-francophone!... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 19:17
BusError Well, for me, it had always been rather clear from... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 20:38
lepetitmartien First OS9 is not, because Stevy said it obsolette,... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 00:13
lepetitmartien …mhhmm forgot… the subject of the hardware forum ... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 00:20
Presto Thanks Damann and BusError I don't believe w... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 14:40
Presto Boll**ks! Its coming fast. If you don... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 19:59
BusError I think the new names for the french forums are pr... dim. 3 nov. 2002, 10:31
Presto Welcome BusError. Thanks. We can propose a new a... lun. 4 nov. 2002, 16:47
kaboombahchuck Well, I'm having a bit of trouble with what al... mar. 5 nov. 2002, 13:08
Soif i agree with u kaboom, creating new forums also in... mar. 5 nov. 2002, 14:35
kaboombahchuck Well, from what I can tell so far...looks pretty g... mer. 6 nov. 2002, 00:10
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :