Pc | Mac Performance Question... Edit V, Input for those who have used Mac and PC |
lun. 14 mars 2005, 06:32
Message
#1
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 12 Inscrit : 13 mars 05 Lieu : Ventura - US Membre no 62,286 |
Hello All,
To give you some background, I'm a PC user from the DOS days and I'm currently running a Custom AMD 64 3000 with 3GB of RAM. I'm a gamer and game developer and musician and I need advice from those who have used both Mac and PC for a good clip of time. I selected the base line Mac G5 and then selected my Custom PC parts for a 2nd computer within the G5 price. Here are the specs. Apple G5 Power Mac 1.8GHz PowerPC G5 256MB DDR400 SDRAM (PC3200) - (Supports up to 4GB) 80GB Serial ATA - 7200rpm NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra with 64MB DDR SDRAM, DVI and ADC ports SuperDrive (DVD-R/CD-RW) Apple Keyboard & Apple Mouse - U.S. English Mac OS X - U.S. English Total = $1,500 or $2,224.00 with 2GB of RAM and a 250GB Hard Drive Custom PC AMD Athlon 64 3000 3GB PC3200 RAM WD Caviar Series 250GB 7200RPM SATA Hard GeForce FX 5200 Video Card with 128MB DDR SDRAM, DVI and ADC ports Sony Internal 16X DVD+/-R / Double Layer/DVD+/-RW Drive Microsoft Natural Multimedia Keyboard & Wheel Mouse Optical Windows XP Pro 3U Rackmount Case Total = $1,300 My biggest problem is I have never seen any comparison of PC vs Mac dealing with audio apps like Logic, Cubase, or ProTools, which I find odd given the “Everyone who is a music pro uses Macs" sort of quotes I have seen and all the talk. I noticed on Apple's site that the single 1.8 G5 vs a 3.4 Intel is 20% > on machines with 2GB of RAM in a Photoshop filter test. But given RAM is a big, big part of performance (especially with a fair amount of plug-ins) a base line 1.8 G5 with ONLY 256MB RAM might not have that 20% margin against an AMD 64 3000 with 3GB of RAM. Here is why I'm hesitant.. The only reason I can think of why Apple doesn't do comparisons is because the performance isn't that great over the PC anymore, and with XP improving (I'm running an OSX skin on XP) the cost/benefits don't hold up like they used to Apple has been having quite of few PC like issues with compatibility problems, loud fans and there is a general sense of a loss of quality (I build my own PC's with a lot of research on parts and I never have issues). Also Apple's install base is lower then most PC makers and there appears to be a negative trend of the quality getting worse the more popular the product gets. This leaves me to conclude that part of their previous quality and overall success is due to it naturally being easier when you have less product to deal with, and a more niche, experienced professional market. For example Apple has a market share of 3.8% for US Personal Computer Market July 2004, while Dell had 34%, HP 19.3%, Gateway 5.6% and IBM 5.6%. Given the numbers, for every 1 mistake Apple has Dell will have about 30. So I think reality is coming to the Apple platform and they are finding out it may note be as easy to do what Microsoft and the PC does, even though Apple's customers for the most part think PC's stink compare to Apple's. As you can see the comparison isn't really Apple's to um, Apple's = ). Any Apple users see this trend as well? Have you had many problems with the last OS change and hardware update. Cost. Even if I was rich, a $1000+ bucks saved can buy an audio interface to speed up the machine, a new Gibson Les Paul, a down payment on a new car. Maybe it's the programmer in me but it isn't computing. = ) Here is why I'm interested.. “Everyone who is a music pro uses Apple”, which means unless these people are just stubborn loyalist afraid to try new things, or dumb, then there must be something useful to Apple's. The interface and design is great. I have played on them a bit, but no long term experience to compare my PC experience in audio or programming. I want to try to port my game technology to the Mac and tap the growing but open market. Also, any news on how Cubase SX 3/ Nuendo compares on Mac vs PC? I have read that some Mac users think the Mac version is taking a backseat to the PC in development, and the PC version is running much better then the Mac version. And finally, does upgrading a Mac “breaking the seal” VOID the warranty?? Given that Apple is trying to run a hardware monopoly and charging $525 for an upgrade to 2 GB of RAM when I can buy 3 GB of Corsair for $300 I find this important. I didn't see it listed in plain text on the warranty. But if it doesn't that would help me justify the switch and save money. Otherwise,, since I just can't buy a new low cost part like on PC I wouldn't want to void the warranty and then have the Motherboard die. So can anyone help? Any Mac users here really know, or do you all just take it on faith that Macs are better? That is hard for me to do given the cost involved and that I'm not careless with my money. Please no rude, unhelpful posting. If you need to do it to get off then by all means, but keep in mind that I'm interested in Macs or I wouldn't be here, I would do the same if a PC cost $1500 and I could build my own Mac with a larger HD and more RAM for $300 less. Thanks All! Ce message a été modifié par designlord - lun. 14 mars 2005, 06:34. |
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
designlord Pc | Mac Performance Question... Edit V lun. 14 mars 2005, 06:32
arvidtp hey - here's my 1.9999… cents dont buy RAM fr... lun. 14 mars 2005, 07:23
dixiechicken Mac OS-X is in many respects a great operating sys... mar. 15 mars 2005, 00:41
arvidtp hey - here's my 1.9999… cents dont buy RAM fr... lun. 14 mars 2005, 07:23
dixiechicken Mac OS-X is in many respects a great operating sys... mar. 15 mars 2005, 00:41
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :