 Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack |
 jeu. 15 avril 2004, 14:29
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 13 Inscrit : 21 déc. 03 Lieu : Pittsburgh - US Membre no 31,548  |
I'm wondering which audio interface would be better for my needs. I'd like to record voice and acoustic guitar using two different mics and afterward doing some harmony vocals and perhaps a second guitar track and some bass. The real problem I want to avoid is major latency. Will I have substantially less with the firewire digi 002r than with the mbox. Some users have said that the latency with mbox is not a problem while others have said it is a true annoyance. Just wondering what some of you users of either audio interface have to say. Also, how many audio inputs can the digi 002r take at a time? I know the mbox can only take two, which of course is pretty limited.
|
 |
 
|
Les messages de ce sujet
JPSpecial Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack jeu. 15 avril 2004, 14:29
PristineRec I've never used an Mbox, but I have never had ... jeu. 15 avril 2004, 15:30 Barb I own both the MBox and the digi002. I use the MB... ven. 16 avril 2004, 13:52 kolo Look, you only get latency if you are using the co... ven. 16 avril 2004, 14:12 beltunabob Sorry, I'm an ABSOLUTE newbie. Latency means..... ven. 16 avril 2004, 14:33 kolo Latency as in LATE. That is You are playing or sin... ven. 16 avril 2004, 16:13 JPSpecial What is the difference between using the computer ... sam. 17 avril 2004, 03:57 beltunabob OK i understand Latency. What book(s) are recommen... sam. 17 avril 2004, 14:36 kolo I don't know much about the Mbox. But direct m... sam. 17 avril 2004, 16:12 arvidtp yes, the Mbox does direct monitoring. It's har... sam. 17 avril 2004, 16:56 bjkiwi one thing to be aware of when using an M-Box on a ... lun. 19 avril 2004, 03:03 arvidtp Yeah - what's up with that??? It is weird that... lun. 19 avril 2004, 03:27
bjkiwi this is only an issue with the MBox on the Mac. I ... mer. 21 avril 2004, 03:52  |
2 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (2 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
