 Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack |
 jeu. 15 avril 2004, 14:29
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 13 Inscrit : 21 déc. 03 Lieu : Pittsburgh - US Membre no 31,548  |
I'm wondering which audio interface would be better for my needs. I'd like to record voice and acoustic guitar using two different mics and afterward doing some harmony vocals and perhaps a second guitar track and some bass. The real problem I want to avoid is major latency. Will I have substantially less with the firewire digi 002r than with the mbox. Some users have said that the latency with mbox is not a problem while others have said it is a true annoyance. Just wondering what some of you users of either audio interface have to say. Also, how many audio inputs can the digi 002r take at a time? I know the mbox can only take two, which of course is pretty limited.
|
 |
 
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
mer. 21 avril 2004, 03:52
Message
#2
|
|
|
Member  Groupe : Members Messages : 51 Inscrit : 02 août 02 Lieu : Sydney - AU Membre no 6,491 |
this is only an issue with the MBox on the Mac. I emailed digidesign support (asia/pacific as I am in Australia) and got this reply:
"This is a common sence. If you do any hard drive recordings, you can not avoid latency. This is not just ProTools issue. It's the same on all other HDD recording devices. Please research the web about the latency. Visit www.google.com and type in LATENCY. If you are using Mbox. Here is the work around for latency. -Mute the recoding track and set the Mix knob on Mbox to blend input source and the playback sound." to which I replied: Thank you for your reply but you've missed my point. I'm not talking about monitoring latency as I do understand that is a given with computer based recording. What I am refering to is the fact that once a track, or tracks, is recorded it ends up playing back 164 samples late. It appears it is only an issue with Macs. they replied again with: "This is the latency anyways but this one was considered as a bug, and had been fixed in PTLE6.4. Please check the update information here. http://www.digidesign.com/support/cs Sorry about the inconvenience. so in the end they've admitted it was a bug that has been fixed in 6.4 |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
JPSpecial Mbox Vs. Digi 002 Rack jeu. 15 avril 2004, 14:29
PristineRec I've never used an Mbox, but I have never had ... jeu. 15 avril 2004, 15:30 Barb I own both the MBox and the digi002. I use the MB... ven. 16 avril 2004, 13:52 kolo Look, you only get latency if you are using the co... ven. 16 avril 2004, 14:12 beltunabob Sorry, I'm an ABSOLUTE newbie. Latency means..... ven. 16 avril 2004, 14:33 kolo Latency as in LATE. That is You are playing or sin... ven. 16 avril 2004, 16:13 JPSpecial What is the difference between using the computer ... sam. 17 avril 2004, 03:57 beltunabob OK i understand Latency. What book(s) are recommen... sam. 17 avril 2004, 14:36 kolo I don't know much about the Mbox. But direct m... sam. 17 avril 2004, 16:12 arvidtp yes, the Mbox does direct monitoring. It's har... sam. 17 avril 2004, 16:56 bjkiwi one thing to be aware of when using an M-Box on a ... lun. 19 avril 2004, 03:03 arvidtp Yeah - what's up with that??? It is weird that... lun. 19 avril 2004, 03:27
 |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
