MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Is There Any Creamware-user In The Room?, F.Hund announcement
melenko
posté mer. 4 févr. 2004, 21:00
Message #1


SuperHero
********

Groupe : Members
Messages : 4,781
Inscrit : 19 nov. 02
Lieu : Bruxelles - BE
Membre no 9,408




hello,
after the recent news received from F.Hund,
how do you feel?
what would you do?
buy a Noah, move to another souncard?
SFP is a very smart concept,including a complete virtual studio
except the sequencer, but with some very good synths and effects!
and...converters!
i'm using a pulsar 2 running under os9.2.2 on a g4 bi-pro 1ghz,
and i love this card, but what's the future?
carrying out the developpement of an osx support "is not a priority"!
gosh!!
we,the mac-users, are we so weak?
our market does interest Motu,M-audio,Digidesign, and so on...
i'm really disappointed by what i read.
do you have any feeling about?
thanks for any anxwer
angry.gif wub.gif huh.gif wink.gif angry.gif


--------------------
MacPro dual 2.66 - 8 Go - SL10.6.6- DP 7.2.1 - RME FFCE 800 - URS, Sonnox, Stilwell, Nomad Factory, Kontakt 4.2.2, Trillian, Stylus, EZ drummer, SD2, UVIworkstation, Altiverb - KRK - JBL
Neve 8801 - Brauner - Roland A-37, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
Ayci
posté jeu. 25 mars 2004, 16:28
Message #2


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 9
Inscrit : 13 janv. 04
Lieu : Puteaux - FR
Membre no 33,073




Hi all,

I just poster a message to ask about OSX compatibility .... but reading this thread answers my questions very well!

I have a PC running a Pulsar 2 and I recently got a Powerbook G4 and fell in love with it and OSX. I was thinking of buying a new audio interface to plug my hardware instruments on the Mac but I feel it's a shame not to use the Pulsar 2. So I had the brilliant idea to get a G5! Yeah ... lol ...

But, with no PCI-X and OSX compatibility, it's very unlikely I do that angry.gif

Too bad for my Pulsar 2, cause I'm not going back to the PC world. I am tired of having to set up the whole thing for 20 minutes before being able to produce any sound. And no my PC is not dedicated to music only and yes my studio is well organized (i don't have that many instruments or gear) and I feel that it would work better with OSX, even not dedicated to music only ...

... or is it the routing thing of the pulsar that makes things so powerful but also more complicated ?

Vincent
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - mercredi 27 nov. 2024, 20:36
- © MacMusic 1997-2008