MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> What Should I Choose, MAC VS. PC
sampoo
posté mer. 14 mai 2003, 15:22
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 17
Inscrit : 14 mai 03
Lieu : HOLLAND - NL
Membre no 17,890




Hi All,
I'm not posting because i wan't to start a mac vs. pc discussion but i just can use some good advise. At the moment i use a PC in my studio wut i need to upgrade soon.
My PC isn't stable and i'm a bit tyred of al the bleu sceerns, lost work and reinstalling windows, ... so i'm thinking of buying a MAC. There are a couple of things i would like to know and i hope someoone can help me out.
1. I'm used to cubase and i would like to keep using this but will cubase run smooth on a MAC (sice i heard it was written and optimized for the PC)
2. I use Wavelab and Soundforge on my PC now but both programs aren't available for the mac.
Witch (good) audio recording/editting software is there for the MAC
3. I called some local music shops who tells me that nowadays pc's running windows xp are just as stable as the MAC. Any people here who use both or are recently switched from pc to mac?

Thanks in advance
alex
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
dixiechicken
posté jeu. 15 mai 2003, 17:52
Message #2


Moderator
Icône de groupe

Groupe : Team
Messages : 370
Inscrit : 19 mars 03
Lieu : Umeå - SE
Membre no 14,645




Hi Sampoo!

My background - I'm a sysadmin for a dept at our university -mixed environment with som
250 computers 2/3 are pc:s 1/3 are macs & handful of unixes/linux boxes.

I'm using Windows XP and RedHat Linux 9.0 on my Fujitsu notebook.
Mac OS X 10.2.6 on my iMac flatpanel.
On my Grey G4 AGP 400MHz Mac I run Yellowdoglinux 3.0, Mac OS 9.2.2 and Mac OS X 10.2.6.

1)
Not true, today at least, I know several people that uses Cubase on the Mac and swear by it.

2)
Spark XL by TC-Works, Peak by Bias - are just two.

3)
Nope, it is not that simple. Stability depends on lot of factors on any platform.
My experience of XP is - the sytem is fairly stable but the apps crashes a lot
and its quite slow. My Fujitsu a P4 1.8 GHz is struggling a lot.

PC:s with windows NT/2000/XP are very hardware sensitive and can be very tricky to get stable.
( scsi - cards are notoriuos in this respect )

I can grade stability for you based on my own experience, from stablest to most unstable.
( in this little list I presume the systems to be correctly setup )

Linux, Mac OS X, windows 2000, Mac OS 9, dos 6.22, Windows XP, Windows 95, Windows ME,
Windows 98.
In this list Linux & Mac OS X is way ahead of the rest of the pack, simply no comparison.
Win98 is the worst piece of shit I have ever used.

Cheers: Dixiechicken


--------------------
==================
Oh my god it's full of stars…
---------------------------------------------------
Mac-G5-2x.2.0, OS-X 10.5.1, 250/200Gb HD - 7.0Gb ram
DP-5.13, Motu 828 MK-II, MTP AV Usb, ltst drvs,
Kurzweil-2000, EPS-16, Proteus-2000, Yamaha 01V
Emes Kobalt monitors
================================
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Les messages de ce sujet
- sampoo   What Should I Choose   mer. 14 mai 2003, 15:22
- - Synthetic   I have heard Cubase SX on OSX is supposed to be re...   jeu. 15 mai 2003, 18:28


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - vendredi 5 juil. 2024, 12:34
- © MacMusic 1997-2008