MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use?, Cubase SX? Cubase SL? MOTU DP? Protools?
Kyle
posté lun. 17 févr. 2003, 17:02
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 4
Inscrit : 17 févr. 03
Lieu : Alpharetta - US
Membre no 12,515




Hey everybody. I just recently switched from a PC to my wonderful new PowerMac duel 1.25GHz G4. While on PC I used Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 and Sonar for all my recording/sequencing. Now that I'm on a mac, what should I look into? I seem to have noticed that the big players are Protools 6, MOTU Digital Performer, and Cubase. Any others I should look into? Thanks in advance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
hanikfashhou
posté mer. 12 mars 2003, 11:19
Message #2


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 9
Inscrit : 26 sept. 02
Lieu : Manchester - UK
Membre no 7,964




I have a 1.25GHz Dual Processort, I'm running Cubase SX, with OSX. I produce commercial dance tracks.

Cubase SX has been redesigned, the Audio handleing is much better than previous versions, if you want to produce dance music, then Cubase SX is the best.

lepetitmartien said Cubase is a little less pro, Im not sure which angle he is coming from, because in the dance music industry Cubase is as good as any!

Pro tools is too expensive, and personally not worth the cash, Cubase can do as much as Pro Tools as a total audio sequencer, if you want to do Audio Post for Movies then get Pro Tools. If you want to make quality dance tracks then get Cubase.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Les messages de ce sujet
- Kyle   Just Switched To Mac, What Sequencer Should I Use?   lun. 17 févr. 2003, 17:02
- - iman   Hey kyle, i'm new to this myself (recent purch...   lun. 17 févr. 2003, 23:09
- - lepetitmartien   Welcome! Now on the sequencers: If you ne...   lun. 17 févr. 2003, 23:48
- - Kyle   Sounds great! Thanks for all the suggestions. ...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 00:07
- - garysome1   lepetitmartien, I'm curious, what leads you to...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 05:40
- - stergz   One thing to note about Pro Tools 6, is that you c...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 07:05
- - rickenbacker   Ahem, LPM, I don't know if I'd call Cubase...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 11:06
- - lepetitmartien   QUOTE (Kyle @ Feb 18 2003, 00:07)but what abo...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 16:44
- - rickenbacker   QUOTE I think that if you can, you should really h...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 17:42
- - Kyle   Once again, wonderful feedback. I have now removed...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 17:50
- - lepetitmartien   You'll can still use PT free when it'll be...   mar. 18 févr. 2003, 23:47
- - anarchosyn   Kyle, it really comes down to what you feel you...   mer. 19 févr. 2003, 05:52
- - rickenbacker   Kyle: I don't know where you're based, but...   mer. 19 févr. 2003, 12:37
- - sazerac   Just thought I'd add my two cents - I started ...   mer. 19 févr. 2003, 18:07
- - liquidh2o   if you decide to go the Cubase route, I have the f...   sam. 8 mars 2003, 13:58
- - mook noodler   Hey Kyle, Steinberg has a demo version of Cubase S...   mer. 12 mars 2003, 05:50
- - rickenbacker   I side with hanik over SX, but I'd go further ...   mer. 12 mars 2003, 12:59
- - lepetitmartien   hanikfashhou cubase has had midi timing problems f...   jeu. 13 mars 2003, 03:47
- - hanikfashhou   Rickenbacker, unfortunately I havent used SX for r...   ven. 14 mars 2003, 02:36
- - horselesspaul   Kyle, Can I just add that the oft aired Logic is w...   ven. 14 mars 2003, 09:16


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - samedi 1 mars 2025, 18:52
- © MacMusic 1997-2008