MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Ok, Can Anyone Enlighten Me?
JackC
posté lun. 11 nov. 2002, 13:05
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 15
Inscrit : 15 août 02
Lieu : DUBLIN - IE
Membre no 6,879




I'm about to buy a new system for use as a pro mobile setup. I've got a PT Mix Plus System in my Studio (which I'm probably going to let die because I can't justify giving Digidesign another 10-15K just to stay 'up-to-date'). So... I'm looking at Logic 5 OSX (been using v.4 for a while - extremely impressed with all the features and instruments). I need a Pro front end (I've been using Apogee's in my Studio) and I will probably go with the Prism Dream ADA as it sounds amazing and is completely upgradeable as far as sample and bit rates go.
But which audio card to buy...?
Unfortunately I've been spoiled with ProTools as far as latency goes (by this I mean happily monitoring an input with Plugins on it while recording, while also running up to 40 other tracks with Plugins on them) and I've been led to believe that I can now get this type of performance from a Native system on a super fast Mac under OSX. True?
Is it, or will it be possible for example to record and monitor an Electric Guitar track with an 'Amplitude' type plugin on the channel with acceptable latency while running lots of other tracks in my session?
I've been watching the 'Hammerfall' website with interest, apparently their cards can take on some of the DSP involved in keeping the latency time down. But will this become obsolete with the claims that OSX with it's Core Audio will accomplish near to zero latency with no additional DSP hardware?
I really like the look of the new UAD card with it's ADAT I/O. I was planning to buy a UAD card anyway as I've demo-ed one, and the Plugins to my ears seem better than the Bomb Factory equivalents.
So basically what I'm asking... (sorry for the long drawn out, bracket infested post!) ... can someone give me suggestions for an audio card and... whats the truth about all the latency free recording claims under OSX? Can I get performance equal to my Mix Plus on a new Native system?
Thankyou for bearing with me!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
Levon River
posté jeu. 14 nov. 2002, 12:37
Message #2


Senior Member
****

Groupe : Members
Messages : 296
Inscrit : 10 août 02
Lieu : Rimghobb - UA
Membre no 6,734




QUOTE (damann @ Nov 14 2002, 02:39)
i'm actually using motu 896 and 828 interfaces with no apparent problems under x.

When you say "using," does that include any any actual Bell Labs smoke tests using >2 channels for recording and/or playback?

Same question to formatj re: this quote:

QUOTE (formatj @ Nov 12 2002, 23:27)
I am working totally mixerless and have no problem with monitoring latency with 26 input channels.

Hate to pester you both, but trying to get real planet Earth information on the actual current state of multi (>2) channel audio I/O in OS X is like trying to catch a greased pig.
huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (3 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - mercredi 25 déc. 2024, 06:51
- © MacMusic 1997-2008