Categorisation Of Forums, Hardware is hardware |
|
|
|
|
Réponse(s)
|
mar. 5 nov. 2002, 14:35
|
Webmaster
Groupe : Admin
Messages : 3,204
Inscrit : 29 oct. 00
Lieu : Sommieres - FR
Membre no 11
|
i agree with u kaboom, creating new forums also invite people to post more (that's one of the points) Another point is to split existing general categories into more specific categories: the choice is not motivated by pure logic, because, as stated buserror, they would always be cases where gears interacts... but if we stay with this 'logic' point of view, we can't split the current 'messy' categories. We (the moderator team and I) think about it a long time before reorganizing the french part of the forums, to get a balance between logic/new motivating forums and categories split (decided by number of post about specific subjects, not logic), and it seems to work, at least not that bad. Here is the list (better descriptions would help a lot): * beginners: all newbie questions, whatever they are (a place were moderator will move newbie recurrent questions) * plug-ins and virtual instruments a lot of posts are related to that) not OS specific * All other softwares under OS 9 * All other softwares under OS X * Interface/card audio+MIDI related problems: (a lot of posts are related to that) not platform specific, software related or not * Mac Hardware and periphericals: CPU, RAM, Fans, power, Harddrive, CDR, etc...hardware only * Synth, samplers, instruments and sounds: even if connected with software (if gear specific). * Studio hardware: mixers, effects, compressor, monitors, headphones, wires....hardware only * Theory and technical: mixing, recording, mastering, digital audio, surround, technology, harmony, etc... * Developpment: (Busserror's forum) for developpers only * OpenBar: for the rest We know there will be cases were the posting choice could balance between two forums, but no system is perfect: at leat this sheme seems to work in most cases and splits things according to the current posts content. Clear and precises titles and descriptions will certainly help to make this simpliest: May be you, the english-native members could help to write it clearer. Sorry for my (uncorrected) english
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
Presto Categorisation Of Forums mer. 30 oct. 2002, 12:40 damann whilst appreciating the fact that small print does... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 03:21 lepetitmartien QUOTE Yeah, agreed! one should never post anyt... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 14:19 Soif We have been working hard with lpm and other team ... jeu. 31 oct. 2002, 14:28 lepetitmartien The problem with newbies we are really aware of it... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 14:36 Presto OK
Let's continue with (non-francophone!... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 19:17 BusError Well, for me, it had always been rather clear from... ven. 1 nov. 2002, 20:38 lepetitmartien First OS9 is not, because Stevy said it obsolette,... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 00:13 lepetitmartien …mhhmm forgot…
the subject of the hardware forum ... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 00:20 Presto Thanks Damann and BusError
I don't believe w... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 14:40 Presto Boll**ks!
Its coming fast. If you don... sam. 2 nov. 2002, 19:59 BusError I think the new names for the french forums are pr... dim. 3 nov. 2002, 10:31 Presto Welcome BusError. Thanks.
We can propose a new a... lun. 4 nov. 2002, 16:47 kaboombahchuck Well, I'm having a bit of trouble with what al... mar. 5 nov. 2002, 13:08 kaboombahchuck Well, from what I can tell so far...looks pretty g... mer. 6 nov. 2002, 00:10
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|