Cubase Sx Or Ableton Live? |
jeu. 6 oct. 2005, 22:08
Message
#1
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 4 Inscrit : 10 mars 05 Lieu : - UK Membre no 62,093 |
Hi
I have managed to get my hands on both Cubase SX & Ableton Live 4 ( a good friend was upgrading and he did me a good deal). Decisions, decisions, decisions... Which one would suit me best? I have an emu audity 2000 which i would love to get cranked and would like to use audio samples too but at the moment dont have any way of heraring the two together. (but i do have an analogue mixer but unsure how to set it all up) This is my first attempt at trying to make my music and although im a wiz when it comes to macs the music side of things kinda baffles me sometimes. any ideas welcome? cheers Humphz -------------------- Power Mac G5 1.6GHZ, 1.25 RAM, Apple 17inch Studio Display, Cubase SX 1.0.4, Garageband, MidiSport 2x2, Emu Audity 2000 Sound Module, Roland PC 160A Midi Controller, Topaz S-Series S16-4 Mixer, Sony Computer Monitors.
|
|
|
Réponse(s)
sam. 1 avril 2006, 00:55
Message
#2
|
|
Maniac Member Groupe : Members Messages : 899 Inscrit : 12 oct. 01 Lieu : Kirkland Membre no 2,002 |
I own both, the real story is about the optimization of both apps. SX has the highest hardware requirement of all the Mac DAWS. And because it shares a code base with the windows version, there is very little Mac specific optimization in the Mac version. So it does not perform well on anything less than a G5 class machine.
From my experience I can use 40%-60% more instances of effects and virtual instruments using Logic or Digital Performer when compared to SX. Good concept, just works 100% better on a PC. And that's where my copy will reside until something changes on the Mac side it's not worth my time. Live is a different animal, when compared to othe DAWs. but again it suffers from poor Mac optimization. It dosen't support the Altivec instructions, and doesn't support dual processors. So even modest Windows machines smoke dual G5's when using Live. You can get work done but dense arrangements are out. Also the live sound engine is not the greatest, so most people ReWire their tracks to their favorite DAW or export the individual tracks into their DAW of choice. So the answer is Logic closely followed by DP4, are the most effecient apps. -------------------- G-Dub
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
humphz Cubase Sx Or Ableton Live? jeu. 6 oct. 2005, 22:08
Jsegura Logic audio man. Is the best. jeu. 6 oct. 2005, 23:15
lepetitmartien If you compare Cubase which is a legacy common gro... ven. 7 oct. 2005, 00:58
mortalengines There is a learning curve with both of these. Liv... sam. 8 oct. 2005, 02:46
gogmagog I guess you have a mac - since u are in this forum... ven. 31 mars 2006, 11:55
gogmagog I just spoke to a mate who is a one man music fact... ven. 31 mars 2006, 12:04
booyakabass Use Logic by far....or at least Logic Express whic... mar. 20 juin 2006, 20:40
gdoubleyou Live has been updated for MacIntel compatibility, ... mer. 21 juin 2006, 20:39
Jsegura Logic audio man. Is the best. jeu. 6 oct. 2005, 23:15
lepetitmartien If you compare Cubase which is a legacy common gro... ven. 7 oct. 2005, 00:58
mortalengines There is a learning curve with both of these. Liv... sam. 8 oct. 2005, 02:46
gogmagog I guess you have a mac - since u are in this forum... ven. 31 mars 2006, 11:55
gogmagog I just spoke to a mate who is a one man music fact... ven. 31 mars 2006, 12:04
booyakabass Use Logic by far....or at least Logic Express whic... mar. 20 juin 2006, 20:40
gdoubleyou Live has been updated for MacIntel compatibility, ... mer. 21 juin 2006, 20:39
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :