MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Which G5 To Get?, How much power is needed?
thegrapeguy
posté sam. 18 févr. 2006, 19:54
Message #1


Rookie
*

Groupe : Members
Messages : 29
Inscrit : 18 févr. 06
Lieu : Bridgeport - US
Membre no 77,070




I am new to the board but based on the purchase I'm about to make I will probably be visiting often. I am entering the world of computer-based recording because the Roland 1680 hard disc recorder I had been using is finally crashed due to disc fragmentation beyond repair.

In my research I have zeroed in on a G5, Logic Pro 7.2, Apogee Ensemble, and a Tascam 2400 audio control surface.
My questions are:

Which G5 should I get? - I have as many as 60 or so single song recording progects at any one time ranging from 16 - 24 tracks of audio. In the summer I offer a Music Video camp and will occasionally produce a "simple" music video with simple editing. I've heard for anything to do with video that the quad core is 2.5 the way to go. However I would like to get away with the 2.3 dual core if it can handle simple video. To what effect does the choice of dual core 2.0, 2.3, or quad core 2.5 G5's have to do with day to day music recording?

Are there any other alternatives for an audio control surface that has 24 faders than the Tascam US 2400? I feel I need this type of unit so that when I mix it will be as "old school hands on the faders" as possible.

I posted this in the "hardware" area as well since I didn't know where to put this post.

Thanks in advance!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
fishboisfo
posté dim. 19 févr. 2006, 08:13
Message #2


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 56
Inscrit : 10 juil. 05
Lieu : San Francisco - US
Membre no 67,641




I strongly feel that you should pick up a quad G5 tower. Its video rendering and audio rendering capabilities alone make it well worth the purchase. It really goes back to how long you want to sit in front of your computer or walking away and come back to your project. If time is important to you, video and audio ( depending on the track load, effects, compression, EQ, etc ) can take a long time to render. If you are doing say an hour of video on a 2.3Ghz machine, it may take you a VERY long time. Add to that new audio, effects, etc -- and your talking . . . paint the garage and come back later kinda wait. DVD authoring and burning is another process to consider. If a 2.3 Ghz machine would normally take an hour to render, a quad will do it in 15 minutes. It has 10 Ghz of processing power; and, although it's pretty steep in price, you will not need to upgrade or want for more for a very long time. The Intel chips are new -- very new -- and although they are quick, G5's with IBM chips have been running exceedingly well and virtually "bug-free" for quite sometime now. Just make sure you max out your RAM -- a 23" screen would be great, and for God's sake get Apple Care -- It will cover your monitor as well -- and that's a really important thing to do -- with any monitor that cost more than $1000 bucks !!

I hope this helps.

Ce message a été modifié par fishboisfo - dim. 19 févr. 2006, 08:23.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Les messages de ce sujet


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - mercredi 4 déc. 2024, 09:10
- © MacMusic 1997-2008