Réponse(s)
|
ven. 25 nov. 2005, 13:53
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 24
Inscrit : 07 juil. 03
Lieu : Nottingham - UK
Membre no 20,901
|
QUOTE (abcdaniel @ Nov 24 2005, 12:16) so maybe the slightest bit of peak limiting on the original track is a good idea. Agree on that, Beya? Haven't done it much myself... Well the whole idea behind parallel or upward compression is to preserve transients, but failing the fact that a slight reduction in db for the channel doesn't have the desired effect, then yes introduce slight limiting. Beya
|
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
neesley Compressor lun. 21 nov. 2005, 10:29 rickenbacker Hardware or software? If software, what host seque... mar. 22 nov. 2005, 13:36 neesley I'm using ProTools 6.9.2 with a DIGI002R. The... mar. 22 nov. 2005, 18:13 loudstring Try using waves L2/L3 ultamaximizer it can be very... mar. 22 nov. 2005, 18:19 beyaRecords USR (www.usrplugins.com) are due to release the AU... mer. 23 nov. 2005, 08:51 rickenbacker Compressors are tricky things to get right - too l... mer. 23 nov. 2005, 11:08 gkdoty Have you tried the
Free Digidesign Dynamics III Di... mer. 23 nov. 2005, 21:36 abcdaniel The 1176 is a free download at digidesign http://w... mer. 23 nov. 2005, 22:50 neesley Everything I've read so far has been great... mer. 23 nov. 2005, 22:53 abcdaniel Hmm, if you use that kind of ratio you should get ... jeu. 24 nov. 2005, 10:14 beyaRecords Try 'parallel compression' which allow you... jeu. 24 nov. 2005, 10:25 abcdaniel Correction: It wasn't "some 90s DBX compr... jeu. 24 nov. 2005, 12:16 neesley abcdaniel: Thanks for the tip on the attack. Come... ven. 25 nov. 2005, 13:22
2 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (2 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|