 Latency In Osx, An end to latency? |
 mer. 21 août 2002, 11:25
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 15 Inscrit : 15 août 02 Lieu : DUBLIN - IE Membre no 6,879  |
I've been a pretty happy Protools user for several years now.
Been putting off buying a new 'native' system 'til the whole OSX audio thing settles down. I think Protools TDM latency is about 1-3 ms on monitoring a record enabled input. I've heard that OSX with audio units is promising the same if not better performance running 'native' Apps?! Ideal scenario: Logic 5 OSX running @ 96k, with true dual processor support. Anyone any ideas if l Emagic plan to release a new Pro 96k Sound Card with multiple outputs? Am I expecting too much? 
|
 |
 
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
mer. 4 sept. 2002, 18:19
Message
#2
|
|
|
Groupe : Messages : 0 Inscrit : -- Membre no 0 |
We'll still be waiting a bit.
To be fair ASIO has been replaced. Rewire and Digi support depends on their code and cooperation. VST's are predomintly OS9 so Developers might as well port to Audio Units as a SDK is going to be available from Emagic to quickly port most code. I think we'll be there. Digi might be the toughest to get on board. Well see. |
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
JackC Latency In Osx mer. 21 août 2002, 11:25
hmurchison Read this
http://gigue.peabody.jhu.edu/~mdboom/l... mer. 21 août 2002, 16:43 damann sounds pretty reasonable to me!
logic does of ... lun. 26 août 2002, 18:28 Yukulele No, Damann, DP with MOTU is a good solution :-)
Ju... mar. 27 août 2002, 02:50 damann well, emagic have just stiffed us all anyway.
l... mar. 3 sept. 2002, 19:32 formatj Why the angry face? Emagic hasn't stiffed anyo... mer. 4 sept. 2002, 06:03 damann i know all of this, the future looks great.
my ... mer. 4 sept. 2002, 09:48 formatj I understand your frustration.
OS X is a great op... mer. 4 sept. 2002, 11:11 damann we're in the same boat bro'
my setup is... mer. 4 sept. 2002, 14:30 kamilof I've installed OS X 10.2 over a OS X 10.1.5 (w... mer. 4 sept. 2002, 16:21
 |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
