440 Forums > English > Mac Music > Audio, MIDI, DSP Cards and Interfaces, Controllers > Digidesign Mbox, Mbox2, 001, 002 etc. Motu Vs Digi 002, whats better? |
  sam. 22 janv. 2005, 13:18
Message
#1
|
|
 Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 4 Inscrit : 21 janv. 05 Lieu : Zagreb - CU Membre no 58,891  |
hello everyone!
i have this dilema... i would like to choose good audio solution for my home studio. some of my friends tell me to go with DIGI 002, some tell me to go with MOTU 828 MkII(and with tascam mixer). i would like to use Pro tools and Logic 7 on the system. do you have any inputs about this? whats better? pro's and cons... please help me get this solved! thanks!!!! ps: i use G4 dual 1.42 |
 |
 
|
 |
Réponse(s)
|
dim. 13 févr. 2005, 23:53
Message
#2
|
|
|
Newbie Groupe : Members Messages : 5 Inscrit : 12 févr. 05 Lieu : Draper - US Membre no 60,367 |
Hey I have a question concerning the Motu 828. From the reviews and explanations I have read about it, it sounds like you dont even need to have a mixer to go with it for live sound. Is this true? or would it be stupid not to have the two?
|
|
|
|
Les messages de ce sujet
imago Motu Vs Digi 002 sam. 22 janv. 2005, 13:18
Nels There is already, much of that type of debate righ... sam. 22 janv. 2005, 15:07 imago thank you nells
i will do the research and make ... sam. 22 janv. 2005, 19:00 lepetitmartien If you want to use PT, you NEED to have some digid... sam. 22 janv. 2005, 22:26 Nels Hence, the word...Proprietary.
You know, imago, a... dim. 23 janv. 2005, 02:46 lepetitmartien On the search, remember the time option is (unfort... dim. 23 janv. 2005, 03:33 kaboombahchuck Yes the MOTU 828 mkII can be used as a stand alone... mer. 16 févr. 2005, 14:49 Metalflkk Yes yes, I would agree with the other posters, go ... jeu. 17 févr. 2005, 05:40 LOSG How about the Yamaha 01X? Do your research, and f... lun. 21 févr. 2005, 16:37
Nels QUOTE (LOSG @ Feb 21 2005, 15:37)Do your rese... lun. 21 févr. 2005, 19:00 |
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
