MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> Mac Mini --> Usb 2 Or Firewire 400?
bcatcho
posté mar. 8 févr. 2005, 04:58
Message #1


Rookie
*

Groupe : Members
Messages : 38
Inscrit : 21 janv. 05
Lieu : East Lansing - US
Membre no 58,914




When looking for an audio input card of any sort for a Mac Mini should i look for a USB 2 device or a Firewire device? Frankly i'm not sure if there is much of a difference or which is faster.

Thanks


--------------------
cheapchops.net = deals on progear and audio stuffs
user posted image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
shaneblyth
posté mer. 9 févr. 2005, 06:24
Message #2


Member
**

Groupe : Members
Messages : 50
Inscrit : 16 juil. 04
Lieu : Queenstown - NZ
Membre no 47,017




There is a copy and post form one comparison

shane


Question: Hold on...USB 2.0 is a 480 Mbps interface and FireWire is a 400 Mbps interface, how can FireWire be faster?
Answer: Raw throughput rating numbers alone don't tell the whole story, as explained below.

The throughput numbers would lead you to believe that USB 2.0 provides better performance.  But, differences in the architecture of the two interfaces have a huge impact on the actual sustained "real world" throughput.  And for those seeking high-performance, sustained throughput is what it's all about (reading and writing files to an external hard drive for example).
 
Architecture - FireWire vs. USB 2.0


 



FireWire, built from the ground up for speed, uses a "Peer-to-Peer" architecture in which the peripherals are intelligent and can negotiate bus conflicts to determine which device can best control a data transfer
 


USB 2.0 uses a "Master-Slave" architecture in which the computer handles all arbitration functions and dictates data flow to, from and between the attached peripherals (adding additional system overhead and resulting in slower, less-efficient data flow control)




 
Performance Comparison - FireWire vs. USB 2.0

 
Read and write tests to the same IDE hard drive connected using FireWire and then USB 2.0 show:
 
    Read Test:

 

5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 33% faster than USB 2.0

160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 70% faster than USB 2.0



 
    Write Test:

 

5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 16% faster than USB 2.0

160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 48% faster than USB 2.0



 
FireWire - Still the Performance King!
As the performance comparison shown above confirms, FireWire remains the performance leader.  And is the best choice for DV camcorders, digital audio and video devices, external hard drives, high-performance DVD burners and any other device that demands continuous high performance throughput.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - mardi 18 févr. 2025, 07:50
- © MacMusic 1997-2008