MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> More Talk On Interfaces, affordable, stable firewire?
JPSpecial
posté lun. 8 nov. 2004, 16:56
Message #1


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 13
Inscrit : 21 déc. 03
Lieu : Pittsburgh - US
Membre no 31,548




Others have been talking about audio interfaces and the issues of usb and firewire. Latency seems enough of an issue in usb that firewire offers the better solution. But which one? The firewire 410 has gotten a lot of negative feedback. The Motu is an excellent product but too expensive for a hobbyist like myself. What about Presonus' firebox, the scaled down version of the firepod? Any user reviews or comments?

I assume firebox would work with Logic. I know it comes with Cubase SE, which I understand demands a lot from your computer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s)
arvidtp
posté mar. 9 nov. 2004, 01:59
Message #2


Senior Member
****

Groupe : Members
Messages : 249
Inscrit : 21 févr. 03
Lieu : Providence - US
Membre no 12,850




I am interested in this presonus interface too, but I am waiting to hear some mac-centric reviews of it - particularly its drivers. That is so important - it makes or breaks a good piece of hardware. Apparently the firePOD is very good in this respect, but I have yet to hear too much from the mac side of things. Because the Firestation, presonus's first firewire interface had miserable Yamaha mLAN drivers apparently. That is different than the drivers for the new presonus stuff, but I still want to make sure.

Firebox PDF sheet: http://presonus.com/pdf/fireboxcut.pdf

The other thing that they mention in the pdf sheet for the firebox is "low latency monitoring" instead of zero latency. What exactly does this mean? Just how much latency when listening to the raw sound of the preamps out the headphone jack? I assume this is because internal routing is controlled by software they will supply with the unit, and therefore must be digitally switched with by definition at least one sample of latency. I doubt the audio has to come into the computer to monitor it, as that would be plain aweful, so it probably will be less than 64 samples, but any monitoring latency I am wary of... Why do they never list the details of latency and stuff in the specs of audio interfaces? That is important to me too, especially enjoying doing things live/improv as I do.

What do you all think?


--------------------
-Arvid •• Squish the Squid Productions, Modest Machine

•• digitally augmented trumpet, TOOB, flugelhorn, cracklebox, percussicube, no-input-mixers and Macbook Pro, 2.4 GHz 15", MacOS 10.5, MOTU Ultralite, Logic Studio 9, MaxMSP 5, JackOSX ••
•• Electronic-experimental, jazz, digital instrument design, electronics, unique software and performance.••
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Les messages de ce sujet


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (2 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - mercredi 25 déc. 2024, 15:28
- © MacMusic 1997-2008