MacMusic.org  |  PcMusic.org  |  440Software  |  440Forums.com  |  440Tv  |  Zicos.com  |  AudioLexic.org
Loading... visiteurs connectés
Bienvenue invité
> What's The Point Of An Audio Interface?, question
karambos
posté ven. 18 avril 2003, 12:40
Message #1


Rookie
*

Groupe : Members
Messages : 40
Inscrit : 30 avril 01
Lieu : München - DE
Membre no 492




Hi,

I have a problem trying to understand what audio interfaces are for. As far as I understand, an audio interface (like something by MOTU or the PROTOOLS 888) sits inbetween the mics you are using to record with and your audio card. Or does it sit between the mics and the desk?

If you are recording a drumkit with, let's say, eight mics, then you could just plug the mics directly into the mixing desk, surely? What's the advantage of having an audio interface to plug your mics into?

THere must be a technical reason but I can't see what it is. Maybe it's just for the convenience of being able to cable any mic to any input on the desk. Is that right?

Please can someone explain why people pay so much for these things?

Thanks


--------------------
Waiting on my new MacBook Pro
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Réponse(s) (1 - 4)
posté ven. 18 avril 2003, 16:20
Message #2





Groupe :
Messages : 0
Inscrit : --
Membre no 0




The audio interface allows the analog information that you're recording (in your case, the drum tracks) to be converted to digital information so that your computer can record it (into some sort of program -- a la Logic, DP, Protools). If you have a sound card built in that does this, then technically you could input audio into your computer that way (though I've never done that). The benefit of something like an 828 is (among other things) that it allows for multiple inputs as well as including mic pres. That way, if you don't have a mixer, and want to record drums with 8 mics, you can do it. Also (and this goes beyond my knowledge), a dedicated audio interface can also let you output your recorded/processed/mixed tracks via lightpipe, etc., keeping it all in the digital realm. I'm sure the others here with much more experience than I can provide some additional useful info, but this is my understanding at least. I hope that helps. And if I've mislead you in here somewhere, I apologize. I'm sure someone else will come to clarify things. biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kaboombahchuck
posté sam. 19 avril 2003, 10:54
Message #3


Advanced Member
*****

Groupe : Members
Messages : 495
Inscrit : 12 oct. 01
Lieu : Chandler - US
Membre no 2,003




I run my mixer directly into my sound card, and that works fine. However, the advantage of having an audio interface (like the motu) is IF your audio recording program can handle it, you can record the drum session in 8 seperate tracks simultainiously, allowing for sound editing later.


--------------------
kaboombahchuck
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alcolo
posté mar. 22 avril 2003, 13:17
Message #4


Newbie


Groupe : Members
Messages : 20
Inscrit : 09 avril 03
Lieu : Mch - ID
Membre no 15,827




Karambos,

I'm at the same point as you but as far as I understood, the audio interface converts Analog signal to Digital and the other way around.
In addition some Audio interfaces have Midi I/O (so they do the Midi inteface) and/or preamps (bad ones, as far as I know...).
But, please also note that some external hardware preamp also have A/D converters....confusing isn't it?
So, it seems like at a certain point you can have functions in double!
For example, I've got a midi interface (Maudio UNO), I'd prefer external preamp (e.g. ART tube MP) and still continue to use Pro Tools Free but at this point, I don't find any Audio interface supporting PTFree and that just provides 2 or 4 analog I/O with XLR.

I'm not an expert, so just consider my comments as the ones from a beginner!
Anyway, I hope it helps...

alcolo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synthetic
posté mar. 22 avril 2003, 14:29
Message #5


Maniac Member
******

Groupe : Members
Messages : 821
Inscrit : 25 juin 01
Lieu : Springfield - US
Membre no 1,082




Yep, as noted above... the main reason for more than 2 inputs is to have the ability to track more than 2 channels at once such as the drum recording. If you use a mixer and record only its stereo ouput... you will loose some of the control of your sound during the final mixing of the project because the 8 mics used to record the drums were squashed down to 2 tracks rather than 8.

Also, having mulitple inputs and outputs allows more creative use of external hardware processors like compressors, fx, and such rather than just relying on plugins. I have a couple processors setup on my digi 001 that lets me send any tracks I like from my ProTools to my FX unit and back or my compressor or tube mic pre and back into the mix and this saves cpu cycles for other plugs. cool.gif


--------------------
----------------------------------------
<span style='font-size:18pt;line-height:100%'>Synthetic Tone</span>
Click above for totally original electronic music, art, & photos.
Click below to become an active member of the MacMusic.org site..

<span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>Become An Active Member</span>

G4 550mhz Tibook & Brand Spankin New Dual G5 2Ghz Power Mac with Tiger.
So long old OS9 apps :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (1 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :

 

Version bas débit - dimanche 22 déc. 2024, 10:15
- © MacMusic 1997-2008