|
|
Réponse(s)
(1 - 6)
|
mer. 13 août 2008, 08:35
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 21
Inscrit : 15 avril 05
Lieu : Norrköping - SE
Membre no 64,114
|
Is it fair to say "one" could think about using the version of software that came out the same time as the computer, (not when you bought it)...
e.g. I have a powerbook which I bought almost 5 years ago. I tried Ableton 7 and the cpu was at 90% without it even doing anything. I went back to Ableton 4 which opens in like 2 seconds and I can play 16 channels with plug-ins fine.
So, does "one" really need all the latest features? Or should you get something that fits the machine you have rather than playing catch-up.
|
|
|
|
|
mer. 13 août 2008, 15:12
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 9
Inscrit : 31 mai 05
Lieu : Seoul - KR
Membre no 66,288
|
Thanks for the input on this. houstonmusic - the macbook is a possibility, but I thought if its $300 or so cheaper for the mini and it can do the same things as the laptop, then I'd lean toward the mini. Plus, if I buy a macbook here, the keypad is configured for Korean. I assume you're running pro tools at your job? It sounds like your job might require a bit more power than what I'm doing. I'm basically just recording one track at a time and using anywhere from 8 to 24 tracks in playback. gdoubleyou - What are the specs on your mac? Also, is the CPU % about the same for PT as it is for Logic? I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to Logic mishmashmole - Reason 4 has got a bunch of features that I've become spoiled with - plus I've become pretty accustomed to pro tools 7. There's no turning back now unfortunately. I appreciate the feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
ven. 15 août 2008, 06:36
|
Newbie
Groupe : Members
Messages : 9
Inscrit : 31 mai 05
Lieu : Seoul - KR
Membre no 66,288
|
Cool - so do you think there would be much difference between the 1.83 GHz and the 2.0 GHz minis? I'd be able to save myself $200 if the 1.83 GHz would be sufficient. Obviously the 2.0 would be quicker, but I can't record more than 2 tracks at once, so my needs are relatively simple. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 utilisateur(s) sur ce sujet (5 invité(s) et 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s))
0 membre(s) :
|
|
|